Juventino[RUS];4850427 said:
So what? Why then Immobile for 18-20m and with 10 goals/3 assists is the flop and Morata for 20m and with 10 goals and 5 assists is not? Just because he is younger?
Age RUS, it's important. One player is in the prime of his career, the other isn't. Most players have their best years from about 23/24-29/30. There are obviously exceptions, but this is generally the case.
Immobile = in the prime of his career
Morata = 1-2 years away from the prime of his career
Hence we can expect more improvement from a young Morata, than Ciro. Obviously. Very simple.
Do you want a list of players who were better at 25 than they were at 22? It includes pretty much every single star to every play the game.
Fuck. This is so retarded. How can you not understand such simple things?
