Alexis Sánchez - Barcelona - ST (12 Viewers)

Sanchez or Pastore?

  • Sanchez

  • Pastore

  • Neymar

  • Amauri


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
Nah, I don't want to get the herpes that Amauri transmitted to you.
Dude we all got infected during the 2009-2010 season.

Nothing we can do about it now, just forget it ever happened. Block it out.


Buffon
Barzagli-Bonucci-Chiellini
Llichtensteiner-Vidal-Pirlo-Asamoah
Llorente-Sanchez

Storari
Caceres-Marrone-New CB*
Isla-Pogba-Verrati-Giacherrini-Peluso
Mirko-Giovinco​

~Immobile/Boayke


*Any names for a decent young affordable CB?

Minimum 2 buys: Veratti & Sanchez. Third being a new CB.
 
Mar 12, 2012
185
What does Pepe offer that Sanchez can't?

4-3-3 even in thread of player who was at his best in 3-5-2. Stop writing about everywhere, formations are not winning matches, you can play like this in FIFA. BTW Isla isn't a RW in attack :sergio:
He excelled in both 3-5-2 and 4-3-3.
His best season with 3-5-2 of Udinese ended with 31 apps, 12 goals and 5 assists.
His best season with 4-3-3 of Barca last season, which was his first season, ended with 25 apps, 12 goals and 5 assists.

Isla isn't a RW? I disagree with you. Isla is a very good versatile player, who has the quality to play in the whole right flank. There are a lot of players like him, for example Barca's Adriano, Spurs's Bale and Asamoah.
He had played as a RW with Chile and Udinese.

BTW what is the wrong thing in discussing the formation in a player thread especially if he is a versatile one? He is not Buffon or Storari. :beer:
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
We have a more creative/teamsynergy SS with vucinic, he would work well with Llorente.
Llorente's sub should be matri, who also is very good at weighing down on a defence, but lacks the consistency in beeing clinical. some periods he is, some he isnt, but works hard as a striker regardless.

For this reason, i think that if we were to buy a new forward, it should be a scoring SS. This guy isnt required to be as good for the team as vucinic, but he should be scoring easely, and making use of the space created by matri.

In easyer games we could field the scoring SS with Llorente, in harder ones vucinic and LLorente to get an upper hand in controlling the game.

I dont consider Sanchez to be a "scoring ss" and to be more like vucinic, as in teamvalue, and creating.

Why would you pick sanchez over a scoring SS @Red
I'm not sure about the Vucinic-Llorente pairing. Should work well in games where Juve are dominant and there isn't much space, but is a bit short of pace for more open games or games where Juve want to play on the counter-attack.

I agree that a goal-scoring SS would be preferable to Sanchez, but Sanchez is that good that I'm not sure it would be resonable to turn down the opportunity to sign him.

My reasoning for looking for a goal-scorer is rather different to yours, though. Just now, Juve don't have a CF capable of consistently contributing to building up the play. That means they need someone like Vucinic to basically play like a trequartista and to have all the play go though him. With Llorente, Juve are going to have much more options for how to build up the play, so there shouldn't be the same need to have one of the forwards playing an almost solely creative role, so they should be able to have a SS who has more of a balance between creativity and goal-scoring.

For playing style, I'd say Suarez and Jovetic would both be better fits for Juve than Sanchez.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
Jovetic pls

- - - Updated - - -

Frankly, we should be happy with any 1 of Jovetic, Sanchez or Suarez. My god the step up in quality they would offer our attack. :superhapp
 

TheLaz

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
5,540
Peluso has a good cross, which is significant. Asamoah is too predictable. If we're going to use a system with wing backs, we might as well use wing backs that can cross. That's why I want Isla to get more playing time.
Asamoah is not predictable. The 3-5-2 offer lots of space out wide and if you only use it to cross i dont see the point in playing someone that much space out wide. Llorente will work himself up as the first choice bomber and both his passing abilities and technique with the ball in his feet will make him more lethal with Asamoah as LWB/LM. It depends how much freedom Asamoah gets - will he be given the chance to play very offensive, I dont see any reason to play Peluso instead. For me Peluso is De Ceglie alike (but solid defensively ofc) yet he isnt dangerous when given space out wide in a situation where Pirlo or someone change the side of play from right to left
 

Nzoric

Grazie Mirko
Jan 16, 2011
37,877
I really like Peluso on the wing. Hes a much better crosser than Asamoah. Still Asamoah should play, simply because we dont concede goals from that side when hes on. Its put on lockdown.
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,177
I really like Peluso on the wing. Hes a much better crosser than Asamoah. Still Asamoah should play, simply because we dont concede goals from that side when hes on. Its put on lockdown.
Asamoah is better then Peluso at everything except crossing :stuckup:

- - - Updated - - -

1st, 2nd, 3rd choice...ready set GO!
1'st choice: Suarez
2'nd choice: Benzema
3'rd choice: Jovetic

Oh, and Lamela would be awesome. That guy has huge potential, but there's no way Roma would sell him to us, and even if they considered it, it'd be for something ridiculous like 25 Million :boh:
 
Dec 24, 2012
1,152
Whatever happened to investing in good young strikers who play for mid-tier clubs in good leagues so they can become great while wearing the Juve jersey, and not before?

This sort of buy is cheaper and has an element of risk, but a young player (not older than 23) signed this way can be molded to fit our needs by Conte and the team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 12)