I was checking some stats about the results of our team while certain players were on the field. The calculation was made like this: for example, we played 1:1 with Torino. While Dybala was on, the result was 1:0 which means that Dybala gets a win for this match. He was replaced by McKennie, and while the American was on, we lost 0:1, so McKennie gets a defeat for this match. Those who played the entire match get a draw of course.
Now, do you know which idiot is by far our worst player in this regard?
Rabiot of course. When he is on the pitch we have 5 wins, 10 draws, and 6 defeats. Juve has 50% wins this season in serie A (13 out of 26), while with Rabiot on we have only 23% wins.
Here is for the other midfielders (green is above average, blue is average or very close, red is below average, or vice-versa for defeats, where below average is in green)
JUVENTUS 13 wins, 8 draws, 5 defeats (50% wins, 31% draws, 19% defeats) 60% won points (47 of 78)
Arthur Melo 7-3-2 (58% wins, 25% draws, 17% defeats) 66% won points (24 out of 36)
Locatelli 12-10-3 (48% wins, 40% draws, 12% defeats) 61% won points (46 of 75)
Bentancur 8-8-3 (42% wins, 42% draws, 16% defeats) 56% won points (32 of 57)
McKennie 9-4-7 (45% wins, 20% draws, 35% defeats) 51% won points (31 of 60)
Rabiot 5-10-6 (23% wins, 47% draws, 30% defeats) 39% won points (25 of 63)
So far only Arthur is clearly above average. Locatelli is close and little above the average, as is Bentancur who is a little below average. McKennie is 10% below average but Rabiot is way way below. We clearly struggle and suck with him on the pitch.