Abortion, good or bad? (21 Viewers)

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
++ [ originally posted by Acies ] ++
It's not exactly mud slinging here. He does use double standards, and that's all I have to say about him.
Fair enough. Can we leave it there? I can't see that argument going anywhere productive (not that any argument here goes anywhere productive, but you know what I mean!)
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Acies

Junior Member
Jun 23, 2005
120
++ [ originally posted by mikhail ] ++

Fair enough. Can we leave it there? I can't see that argument going anywhere productive (not that any argument here goes anywhere productive, but you know what I mean!)
Will do.

I know the subject is touchy.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
++ [ originally posted by Erik ] ++
I'm not pro-abortion, but I am pro-choice. Like a Belgian writer [Geert van Istendael] once said:

"The way abortion is being handled in some countries right now such as The Netherlands is done in a well-thought, left-liberal way. You may not support abortion, but you simply cannot be against those laws."
I don't agree Erik. If abortion is wrong in the manner I feel it is (and I'm far from alone in this!), than I can agree with giving people the choice to abort no more than I can agree with giving people the choice to murder. Slapping nice adjectives on it doesn't make it any better!
 

Acies

Junior Member
Jun 23, 2005
120
++ [ originally posted by mikhail ] ++

I don't agree Erik. If abortion is wrong in the manner I feel it is (and I'm far from alone in this!), than I can agree with giving people the choice to abort no more than I can agree with giving people the choice to murder. Slapping nice adjectives on it doesn't make it any better!
The thing is, the embryo is hardly alive. We place ourselves above animals because we are conscious, an embryo isn't. Since most people don't have a problem with killed animals, I don't see why they should have a problem with killed embryos. An embryo is even less of a living being then an animal IMO.
 

Slagathor

Bedpan racing champion
Jul 25, 2001
22,708
It cannot be compared to murder because there are many different factors in abortion then there are in murder.

Murder:
A killer (possibly more than one) > a victim (possibly more than one)

Abortion:
A doctor (the killer in the murder theory) > the embryo (the victim in the murder theory) BUT there's also:

THE WOMAN

and she has rights. Exactly what those rights are, is something culturally influenced and different throughout the planet but one thing is very clear to me personally:

Abortion cannot be compared to murder just like that because there are many other factors involved. Most notably the woman and her right to live her life the way she wants it.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
++ [ originally posted by Acies ] ++
The thing is, the embryo is hardly alive. We place ourselves above animals because we are conscious, an embryo isn't. Since most people don't have a problem with killed animals, I don't see why they should have a problem with killed embryos. An embryo is even less of a living being then an animal IMO.
The embryo is an organism which will, assisted and uninterrupted, grow into an adult human being. It is as much human as that adult, in the same way that all of the stages prior to adulthood are human. This is my opinion, and the cornerstone of the argument. If it is not true, my argument falls.

++ [ originally posted by Erik ] ++
It cannot be compared to murder because there are many different factors in abortion then there are in murder.

Murder:
A killer (possibly more than one) > a victim (possibly more than one)

Abortion:
A doctor (the killer in the murder theory) > the embryo (the victim in the murder theory) BUT there's also:

THE WOMAN

and she has rights. Exactly what those rights are, is something culturally influenced and different throughout the planet but one thing is very clear to me personally:

Abortion cannot be compared to murder just like that because there are many other factors involved.
Granted, the issue is complex, but the mother's right to convenience does not, IMHO, outweigh a human right to life. Yet again, this is the fundamental difference in our positions.
 

Acies

Junior Member
Jun 23, 2005
120
++ [ originally posted by mikhail ] ++

The embryo is an organism which will, assisted and uninterrupted, grow into an adult human being. It is as much human as that adult, in the same way that all of the stages prior to adulthood are human. This is my opinion, and the cornerstone of the argument. If it is not true, my argument falls.


Granted, the issue is complex, but the mother's right to convenience does not, IMHO, outweigh a human right to life. Yet again, this is the fundamental difference in our positions.

That's important to me, because the embryo isn't selfsufficient. It's like keeping someone alive with machines. Do they really live? IMO an embryo is just a possibilty of life, not yet life. I do see where you're coming from though.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
++ [ originally posted by Acies ] ++
That's important to me, because the embryo isn't selfsufficient. It's like keeping someone alive with machines. Do they really live? IMO an embryo is just a possibilty of life, not yet life. I do see where you're coming from though.
I think I made this point to Nicole earlier. A newborn is hardly more self sufficient than an embryo. It will die quickly, certainly within days, after being abandoned. Yet, we don't consider the termination of such a life legal or ethical? I don't accept that argument.
 

Dominic

Senior Member
Jan 30, 2004
16,706
++ [ originally posted by chxta ] ++

Secondly, I don't think my opinion is a fact. I am a highly opinoated person doesn't mean that I force my opinions on others.

Is that so? Define not giving arguments...
++ [ originally posted by chxta ] ++


The fact remains that abortion is wrong.
 
OP
Chxta

Chxta

Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
Nov 1, 2004
12,088
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #190
    Yes, Dominic I did make that statement and I stand by it. It is my opinion. So have I forced anyone to share that view with me?
     

    Zlatan

    Senior Member
    Jun 9, 2003
    23,049
    ++ [ originally posted by chxta ] ++


    Am I that petty? I am not the person who has at every turn for the last 5 months reminded someone of something that he did a decade ago.

    Secondly, I don't think my opinion is a fact. I am a highly opinoated person doesn't mean that I force my opinions on others.

    Is that so? Define not giving arguments...

    I can and will provoke Zlatan if I want to because he has shown little restraint in this affair.
    I think I have a right to remind you since you did bring up the consequence talk.


    And I really don't see how and why I should show restraint? Did I personaly insult you?


    ++ [ originally posted by chxta ] ++

    Now I am 10 years older, legally responsible for my actions, a lot more mature, sorry that I did that. IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT I HAVE LOST THE RIGHT TO EXPRESS AN OPINION. It is a real put off when a faceless stranger whom I met on an internet forum keeps mentioning that incident from my past in nearly every thread that I participate in and express a strong opinion on an issue, AND ZLATAN IS GUILTY OF THAT.

    TBH, it is neccessary when you use one set of rules and logic for yourself, but not for others.


    ++ [ originally posted by chxta ] ++

    Dominic says I am petty. Maybe I am, but the truth is this: I have ignored Zlatan on that issue since the 2nd of March. That is bollocks. I have had enough of his shit.

    Acies, I'll draw an analogy for you here. Have you watched the movie Wisdom? The young man had a misdemeanour in his earlier life and was sent to jail. Because of that employers refused to touch him, so he had to resort to a life of crime. That is what someone like Zlatan would want for someone like me. And that is crap.

    TBH, you ignore much more, you ignore every argument that you can not respond to, and instead of discussing it you chose to skip over it because it isn't there.

    And all I'm saying is that you didnt pay any consequence for your crime, yet dare to demand others pay consequences for their, completely legal, misstakes.
     

    Zlatan

    Senior Member
    Jun 9, 2003
    23,049
    ++ [ originally posted by Dominic ] ++
    Are you that petty chxta?

    Firsty, you are surprised this turned into a debate, while you started this topic and discussion.

    Secondly you think your opinion is a fact.

    Thirdly, you never give arguments and you tend to ignore the arguments against your 'opinion'.
    Exactly.


    ++ [ originally posted by Dominic ] ++

    And finally you contradict yourself, you blame Zlatan for attacking you and not talking about the discussion. While now you provoke Zlatan, buy calling him the 'Crucify him' brigade.

    Well by all means, I hope you are crucified.

    TBH, in no way did I personaly insult him.


    ++ [ originally posted by chxta ] ++

    Secondly, I don't think my opinion is a fact. I am a highly opinoated person doesn't mean that I force my opinions on others.
    ++ [ originally posted by chxta ] ++

    The fact remains that abortion is wrong.



    And another thing chxta: my "attack" on you, as you call it, is in no way irrelevant to this discussion. In fact, it is very much relevant.

    It was YOU who said abortion was murder, and it was YOU who said everyone should suffer the consequences of their actions., and hence, you opened the door for the discussion about you.


    And also: first you accuse me of being narrow minded but when I respond to your claims you chose to completely ignore my post because it does not suit you or because you dont have the answer. Either way, your shying away from the discussion and hiding behind the claims I attack you or hate you.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,155
    Women who support abortion just want to take the easy way out, unable to handle the responsibility of caring for a child after showing no responsibility at all in getting herself into the whole situation in the first place. And instead of giving her "unwanted" child a life somewhere else in the world, she just wants to take that life away from her child so that nobody else can enjoy caring for it.....rather sick if you ask me.
     

    Nicole

    Senior Member
    Sep 16, 2004
    7,561
    That is crap, I have said alot of times now that if I was in this situation I would have the child myself, but I still support abortion, is that the easy way out Andy?
     

    Acies

    Junior Member
    Jun 23, 2005
    120
    ++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
    Women who support abortion just want to take the easy way out, unable to handle the responsibility of caring for a child after showing no responsibility at all in getting herself into the whole situation in the first place. And instead of giving her "unwanted" child a life somewhere else in the world, she just wants to take that life away from her child so that nobody else can enjoy caring for it.....rather sick if you ask me.
    What a well thought out opinion.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,155
    ++ [ originally posted by Nicole ] ++
    That is crap, I have said alot of times now that if I was in this situation I would have the child myself, but I still support abortion, is that the easy way out Andy?
    You may not be taking the easy way out, yet others do it everyday. To encourage women to take the easy way out is also rather sick if you ask me.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 21)