Search results

Please do enlighten me. Explain to me how something that blatantly contradicts Darwin's theory is actually part os his bigger theory. No, I do have an idea of what I'm talking about. You don't have an idea of what I'm talking about. And please, spare the world your 'religious people are...

All those interpretations were written by one angry atheist. Teaching one to respect his parents is bad how exactly?

Fair enough. Present to me one thing the Bible teaches that can be deemed as "bad" in our world today.

Martin, I am not being clear or are you just blatantly ignoring the facts? Religion is not harmful, maybe those who preach it are but religion in itself is not harmful.

Anth, don't defend Catholic leaders and such. These people are perhaps the most corrupt people in the world.

This specific man was not impure like Osama Bin Laden.

The messages in the Bible are not from man. They are from God.

Electricity.

This proves my point exactly. The Catholic Church are made of men, most of whom are corrupt in their nature. This is why I am saying Religion is pure while man is not.

The bible has the words of God, not man. It is therefore not the work of man.

Ah yes, parrot Darwin's theory like a good boy. This theory by the way is one of the most idiotic theories I have ever come across, I will show you why it is flawed and in fact a good word to describe it's fallaciousness is "altruism". If the 'survival of the fittest' theory was in fact a...

This is true, many religious people are like this. The problem is that these people practice their respective religions in complete conflict with what their very religion preaches. Religion is pure, man is tarnished, impure, evil, manipulating, hypocratic. Many religious leaders such as Bin...

Well, yes, religion is not like science. It does not lay down the facts and the proof for everyone to see, it's not that simple. However, it does have evidence of its validity. One of which is something as simple as the Moral Law. Perhaps that subject is for another day. At the end of the day, I...

why don't I see the humour in that picture?

I understand that. My point is that even so, there must have been something that triggered your thought. Something must have obviously portrayed a bad image of god for you, the most logical explanation I think is the media.

Your whole idea of religion and god is bad came from what? Apples and Bannanas?

The western media.:D But seriously, I really do believe that the media has a profound effect on how and what we think.

The Media certainly has its effects and can be blamed for portraying a misleading perspective on religion.

I think many people have reasons to believe. Countless people have chosen faith after years of studying and reflecting. This as I said depends on the individual, perhaps you see no reason to believe and that's your business. But it is a fact that numerous theists are not merely robots that have...

I'm not following. What do you mean without the god stuff? As in pray9ng and that sort of stuff?