Search results

Him waiting for Pogba is why Juve missed out on Aouar last summer imo. Not accepting that Rabiot, Ramsey were bad moves also problematic.

I think of it like how most companies operate their banking. Below certain threshold, Paratici can sign off, after that need 1 or 2 directors to sign off (Nedved & whichever director is leading the finance team). Above certain threshold, let's say above €40m, you need 2 directors plus President...

If Paratici being fired means no longer being linked with Milik, Jorginho, Emerson etc- I am all for it. Also maybe he has some bias towards some of the shit midfielders he got; maybe a new chief of football/sporting director would be more inclined to sell or relieve them.

:lol: Anyways don't want to put all blame on him as I realised that there were others guys like Aldo Mazzia and Garimberti also making these decisions. Also Inter's Ausilio is pretty good at identifying talents as well; they seem to fall apart after joining the club. Ausilio has been there for...

€160m plusvalenza how? Not adding up. I am getting approx €120m. Pjanic €41.8m, Cancelo €30.4m, Kean €27.1m, Pablo Moreno €7.6m, Muratore €6.8m and Mavididi €4.0m Also I hate this plusvalenza model. Always the question of who's Juve going to sell next. Last year, I predicted Dybala or...

Ofcourse there was no tricking Inter or ManUtd in trying to sell Dybala. It was a contingency plan in case the board wanted to prioritise balancing the books through plusvalenza like the previous CEO instead of having a serious go at the CL and work to increase revenue with sponsors and...

For me, if Paratici can't sell Dybala this summer for a good price this was a bad mercato... especially since I still can't stomach Sarri.

Non-Italian clubs don't depend on plusvalenza to stay within FFP boundaries. It's pretty much the Italian clubs: Juve, Roma, Milan and Inter and the top Portugese clubs. Juve went completely under this model after the Pogba-Morata sale and Higuain-Pjanic buy, there's no way out of it anytime...

The plusvalenza model is Marottanomics. Juve will be stuck with it for years unless Agnelli can pull off some major sponsorship deals or reduce player wages drastically. Paratici does the player trading, if he gets it wrong it's bust but he has to find the plusvalenza for the club to operate.

Paratici's role is same as before Marotta left, sporting director. The way I see it, Paratici was always in charge of player trading, excluding transfer budget, and required approval of someone or more from BoD before a transfer went through- Marotta, Nedved, Agnelli etc. Marotta as CEO was in...

The deal happened because he took the proposition directly to Agnelli and presented it as plausible, no filtering by anybody else.

Caceres is a loan deal btw

What about Centre-mid? We don't have a backup to or competition for Pjanic... Sturaro out on loan and Can in, so similar level replacement... Marchisio resigns but no replacement in... that's on Marotta, Paratici, Marchisio, Allegri or Agnelli?

I hoped that under Paratici Juve would finally stop spending money on backup of backups but here comes Caceres (after the Darmian fright)... hoping that it's a low cost transfer and salary expense deal. Btw... is Paratici's role at Juve really same as Marotta's? I can't find him on the Juve's...