Search results

To this day I can't understand how people can argue argue football to the point of name-calling

I'm pretty sure Pazienza was loaned only because we're planning to offload him in the summer, and we're trying to raise his value by giving him some playing time. His agent has come out and said that he'll return once we have CL football next season, but I have my doubts.

Happy with his contribution; made no mistakes and distributed the ball pretty well, though he's never going to be able to provide the decisive attacking passes that Pirlo does. I'd like to see how he fares against bigger teams that put more pressure on him.

Give me a break, I'm Korean :sad:

Subbing Pazienza on at the end was such an ace move. It reminds me of something that Starcraft players do: they go and build a Command Centre/Nexus/Hatchery in the middle of their opponent's base when they've clearly won the match but their opponent won't forfeit, or they construct a fleet of...

Lemme guess, collision with Chiellini?

Well that's what I was asking above. So he's not even an improvement on Sissoko? :haddadjunior:

Yeah, but that's because Milan has a solid, championship-winning squad. Obviously if he's the only midfield signing we make I'll grab my pitchfork and join the queue, but if he's an improvement on any of our current players and we signed him for free, I don't see what all the moaning is about.

I haven't watched much of Napoli. Is this guy really that bad? Who is he comparable to? Is he better or worse than Pepe in his respective position? I get the feeling that too many people here are just hating on him based on the opinions of a handful of members.