Search results

tbh though Hambon's behaviour is at least worthy of a severe warning. His posts could easily be construed as being offensive

Agreed, bannings such as this should be debated in the mod forum. Its imperative as mods you show a united front or people will start to undermine your authority etc and you will look silly anyway I'm off to get lashed again so good luck with your struggle seven I'm sure you'll get rightfully...

I think he's almost reverted to type. He started out all full of himself like you said, but personally i thought in the 6 months or so before being made a mod he was one of the best posters on here and looked to me at least like mod material. At the end of the day though it appears you were...

I see your point and its a complete;ly understandable and fair one, but saying that isn't really helping your cause

yeah but thats before zlatan is sacked :D

Yeah I've heard that in the past, don't know that he's said it recently. Its only sufficient imo if he himself starts moderating and gray returns.

yeah I can see that. If taken out of context, "fuck yourself in the ass, axlrose" is fairly blatantly a personal insult and should merit a stern warning from a moderator, then a ban for re-offence. Reading the whole post though its pretty obvious its just a joke, not an insult :)

does make a bit of a mockery of the system doesn't it. We could probably do with a new mod since the best one gray is never around, and the pres doesn't appear to actually do any moderating

snoop personal insults are thr norm on these forums - I've had more than my fair share and nobody's ever been banned for them. If people want to believe in a set religion then fine but they shouldn't be exempt from criticism or piss taking imo because these forums are a medium for people to air...

For what its worth I think you should never have been banned. All you said was that you believe all religions to be absolute rubbish (albeit in stronger terms) then took the piss a bit. Religion is a choice, a way of life. People call me a sad bastard for being an accountant - do I care? No...

I'm sorry but generally accepted principles and logic would dictate that believing a man, or men wrote a book, is a much clearer indication of sanity than claiming it to be the work of divine inspiration.

Yeah no worries :)

seven you are the man

Martin what are you on about - the catapult thing? Science gradually replaces religion does not mean all aspects of science have superceded religious texts. Science is a massive area with all kinds of subjects contained within its scope. A book could never hope to contain that much diversity of...

How is evolution debatable? We've seen evolution over the years in various species and are all well aware it is happening all around us. The existence of some divine being, who despite nobody ever having seen/heard/touched/smelt and who lives where exactly is just not a plausible alternative to...

I know what you're getting at Martin but I don't think anyone can say that religion supercedes science. In the beginning there was religion and gradually over time, science and research have disproved more and more of it at least in my eyes. Religion can only try to persuade people, it can...

I always though of religion as an alternative to science really. If religious texts comtain so many references to science then why bother with them? Just read an A level science textbook and you'll get it all in much more detail. I find it hard to figure out how religion and science can ever...

come again?