Search results

:tup: I can't believe people were giving the guy the time of day. :lol2:

In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is King.

This just shows everyone expected the ref's to favour Juve and so these other people had no choice but to do these things. I say Juve should be relegated and these brave souls who tried to fight Moggi's system deserve a medal.

Obviously, it goes without saying, everything would have to be found in Juve's favour before they would be entitled to any sort of damages.

Only overweight moderators will moderate the thread.

That could certainly be agreed if compensation was agreed out of court. I don't know anything about the Italian system for paying fines/compensation, though.

Exactly. There are heaps of theories being put about that are based on sound law, but in practice none of them stand a chance. There just isn't enough money to compensate Juve, and the other clubs who suffered, which is why I hope the court goes for the 'everyone is guilty' argument and makes...

:agree: Be man enough to leave a false name.

They aren't allowed anymore.

The ones of scantily clad women?

Someone actually reads Lion's posts? :shocked: I'll knock down your fence, then.

I find your sexism very offensive.

These things always look convincing when you are only hearing one side of the story.

What is legally possible and what is likely to happen are two very different things.

But it is still only the evidence tampering that is relevant, not what may or may not happen to Auricchio after this trial.

That may sound nice, but it isn't relevant at the moment.

If goal.com are actually improving, and this is not an isolated bit of useful journalism, the ban may have to be reviewed.

:tup: First hurdle cleared.

That is how I see it, provided both clubs were doing much the same thing.

Not automatically, I wouldn't have thought. It would probably need a separate court case.