no, i´m mourinho´s official moral lawyer :) ahahahh
to lose 10 points for those rubbish is pathetic.
football is played in the field not at any desk!!!
he was 20 assists. enough to me. just because he´s not a dribbler like others doesn´t he´s a great passing player. he´s a"quick pass" player. something that most players can´t do.
but i respect your opinion. but let me say to you that nedved is the player that was more underrated since lazio...
at the moment he is. nedved has lot his pace. he was for several years(lazio and juve) the most complete but the years go by and the mourinho factor changes many things.
when he was in west ham and before roman he was the best of the team.
you´re so bias towards united that you can recognise tremendous quality in lampard.
to you ceh is worse than howard and so on............
mourinho is the messiah to any team he coaches.
juve would "kill" to have him because with jose juve will already be champion of italy, way ahead juve.
you can dislike him but , no one, can deny his tremendous impact.
he´s the best of all!!!!!!!
you dislike chelsea because yhey´re unstopable if they were harmless , like the zola period, you will all love them...............
lampard has nearly 20 assits to goals. he´s the heart of chelsea midfield. and you say that cahill is better.............
c´mon!!!!!!!
sorry, but to say that cahill is better than lampard is laughable, to say the least. without offense.
lampard is , perhaps, the most complete palyer in the world.
If you knew me, you'd know titles arent so important to me as you think...
a typical looser phrase......... i would like to see you say that after the treble in 1999..............
if mourinho vanished united could won again in england because as long he stays in chelsea united will not win...