Wishlist and General Juve mercato talk (2013-14) (45 Viewers)

[Nzoric]

No to Zlatan.. He is an player who wants to be in the picture and he wants a team that plays in function of him. That was clearly at Milan but also this season at PSG.. When he is suspended or injured PSG don't know what to do.. I rather pay more for a player like Jovetic, Suarez or Sanchez, who play in function of the team than Zingaro who wants al the attention. He may cost 17 mil but he will have a massive contract with maybe 7-8 million netto a year.. The other players like 4-5 million and they are all younger, don't have such a big ego and didn't leave us for merda. Also we have a team now that plays well together, with that big Nose in front that will changes.. Vaffanculo con Zlatan.

When you have the best striker in the world, it's only natural to pin the play on him.
His attributes fit us perfectly, so we wouldn't have to make any major changes to accomodate him in the system which works.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Robee]

No use in buying a 32-year old selfish prick when our team is value number one and our top earner (next season) plays the exact same position. It would unsettle everything. So stay where you are and rot in Paris...

I hope we draw PSG and Chiellini reawakens his fear for King Kong in the second leg.

 

[Robee]

His attributes fit us perfectly.

No they don't. What we need is a striker that speeds up our play, not slows it down everytime he is in possession...

We don't have problems winning the league. We need a push in the CL and Ibra is simply NOT that guy.

 

[napoleonic]

fact, ibra > vucinic+giovinco+matri+quaq+bendtner+boriello+anelka.

Ibra + llorente is better than a bunch of mediocre and inconsistent groups of forwards even if it only for 2 seasons, in 2015 we can surely buy someone else.

 

[Robee]

We're preferably playing with 2 second strikers nowadays: Vucinic - Giovinco.

Yet there are still people talking about Llorente - Ibra as if Conte wants to change our entire gameplay...

 

[Cronios]

We're preferably playing with 2 second strikers nowadays: Vucinic - Giovinco.

Yet there are still people talking about Llorente - Ibra as if Conte wants to change our entire gameplay...

Not preferable, only due to lack of options.
This happens only because of Marotta's inability to land a proper finisher, well at least anything better than Bendtner and Borriello, so no wonder we have to compromise and thus suffer offensive competitiveness because of this.
But if we want to improve further more, we must do smth about it!

 

[Nzoric]

Not preferable, only due to lack of options.
This happens only because of Marotta's inability to land a proper finisher, well at least anything better than Bendtner and Borriello, so no wonder we have to compromise and thus suffer offensive competitiveness because of this.
But if we want to improve further more, we must do smth about it!

He got Llorente and he got Matri who is a finisher. Just shut up already, you old bitter man.

 

[Bianco2nero]

When you have the best striker in the world, it's only natural to pin the play on him.
His attributes fit us perfectly, so we wouldn't have to make any major changes to accomodate him in the system which works.

In my Opinion he isn't the best striker. And one of our strenght is that we are very strong as one block and we have plenty of players who can score (not +15 but you know what i mean)..
In the system that we play we need a forward who is fast, has technical qualities (dribbling, passing etc) and who can score.. And if you take al those tasks togerther, Zlatan isn't the one.. Besides that we have already Llorente.. He is not better than Zlatan but he earns 4 mil, why pick the same type of player if you have Matri as back up?

For me: Matri, Llorente, Giovinco, Vucinic & Jovetic/Suarez of Sanchez would be perfect.

 

[napoleonic]

wait, people actually classify Ibra the same as Llorente and thus the same kind of Trezeguet? wut?

 

[Osman]

He got Llorente and he got Matri who is a finisher. Just shut up already, you old bitter man.

He doesnt need to shut up, he is right, our lack of quality striker has made us lacking in offensive competitiveness as he said, Llorente hasnt arrived yet, and Matri is certaintly not a success story and the steady main choice we need (squad player).

 

[Robee]

wait, people actually classify Ibra the same as Llorente and thus the same kind of Trezeguet? wut?

No one is saying that but with your reasoning: Chimenti = Buffon.

They're different types but still play the exact same position.

 

[Robee]

He doesnt need to shut up, he is right, our lack of quality striker has made us lacking in offensive competitiveness as he said, Llorente hasnt arrived yet, and Matri is certaintly not a success story and the steady main choice we need (squad player).

But Llorente WILL arrive and that makes te whole Ibra debate useless, unless we decide to sell Llorente immediately...

We're not going to marginalise our future top earner...

 

[Collaguazo]

We should get Zlatan and then fire him for the sole reason that the team he leaves, goes and wins the CL next year

 

[Zacheryah]

If zlatan could work better with trezeguet then del piero could for a while, then why wouldnt it work with Llorente ?

 

[Collaguazo]

Forget about the jovetics, sanchezes and zlatanes. We should get Lukaku and together with Pepe Pancho Cevallos we will rule the world. The mightiest attack the world has ever seen.

 

[Osman]

But Llorente WILL arrive and that makes te whole Ibra debate useless, unless we decide to sell Llorente immediately...

We're not going to marginalise our future top earner...

Um Llorente is not half the player Ibra is, I would sign the latter 10 out of 10 over Llorente. He can be his backup if he doesnt prove to be good enough to start (which is quite likely, he is unknown quality in top level).

 

[Robee]

If zlatan could work better with trezeguet then del piero could for a while, then why wouldnt it work with Llorente ?

Zlatan was a completely different player back then. That is a terrible comparison.

 

[Robee]

Um Llorente is not half the player Ibra is, I would sign the latter 10 out of 10 over Llorente. He can be his backup if he doesnt prove to be good enough to start (which is quite likely, he is unknown quality in top level).

Half the player and earns 3 times less. Best value for money: Llorente.

Llorente will be our top earner when he arrives and you're talking about making him a backup. That is ridiculous. And assuming Llorente isn't good enough to start is even far worse.

 

[Zacheryah]

Zlatan was a completely different player back then. That is a terrible comparison.

The point is he proved he can play alongside such player.

- - - Updated - - -

vucinic,jovetic, zlatan, llorente

Its possible, but there is more chance to win the lottery

 

[Robee]

The point is he proved he can play alongside such player.

He COULD play alongside such a player in 2006. Past tense is important here. We're talking about 2013-2014 now and things have changed.