They were poor in the final, but they were the best team. They were also better than France, who were gifted a penalty early on. The Italians actually scored themselves. As for the other incidents.. a 10 man France? For what? 4 minutes? Hardly the biggest influence ever on a football game. And the guy fucking headbutted a player. Get over it. He should never have done it.
But Italy were probably the best team at that time. And even if they weren't they were in the top three. Uruguay on the other hand really don't come close TBH. They're also in the semis after a miracle against Ghana and an easy second round game against Japan.
But Italy were probably the best team at that time. And even if they weren't they were in the top three. Uruguay on the other hand really don't come close TBH. They're also in the semis after a miracle against Ghana and an easy second round game against Japan.
Italy were poor in the first round, they were a little lucky with a poor refereeing decision against Australia. Then they played Ukraine in the quarters, then there was the first and only real test in the route to the final against Germany, in which admittedly the Italians were very convincing.
The French team were poor in the first round, but then had a very tough route to the final, playing the very convincing Spanish side in the second round, then the favorites Brazil in the quarters, then it was against a tough Portugese side in the Semi's. They were convincing against all those teams. I believe that before the final, France were the better and more convincing team. Then the final was won by a penalty shoot-out, hardly something that makes Italy a better team.
