whos going to get Chiellini - tug of war (1 Viewer)

[Alexi-10]

Hopefully we can keep him. Giorgio Chellieni can definately be a replacement for Zambrotta but for now it is better for him to stay in Fiorentina to get more experience and develop into a star player.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Desmond]

one wonders what a player on loan/co-ownership must do to earn a place in Juve.

Miccoli and Maresca had proved beyond doubt that they could be world beaters,and that couldn't save them from Moggi's stubborn policies.

 

[Alexi-10]

I totally agree Desmond, Maresca was a great player for Juve last season and they send him to Fiorentina and Miccoli aswell. In my opinion we should have kept both of these great players instead of having to buy Zlatan Ibrahimovic because Miccoli is better than him. I definately don't want to lose Chiellini but he said Zambrotta was ahead of him at Juve and he would like to stay at Fiorentina longer. That's okay I guess but a permanent deal, no way!

 

[Desmond]

unfortunately Moggi will be sticking to his policies after our good start this season.I bet he think's he's pretty darn smart right now.

 

[#10]

if we make any signings , i would merely brinng in mutu and jank.......or bring back all three violla players...includig chie

 

[Modo Bianconero]

well chiellini stays at viola for a couple of years is right cause zambrotta can be replaced .. he can be brought in and zambro moved to camos place which shuldnt happen anytime soon .. koz even if we lose camo olivera is right there..... sooo i think fiorentina need him more .. we shuld never give a way our right to call him back whenever we shuld always have half his contract same goes for dat lil bastardo miccoli hes gonna come back to juvy sooner or later whether he likes it or not... its like callin them into war as reinforcements they cant just wuss out.. their ass is OURS

 

[Desmond]

++ [ originally posted by John #10 ] ++
if we make any signings , i would merely brinng in mutu and jank.......or bring back all three violla players...includig chie

absolutely,john.we shouldn't have let the three of them go to fiorentina,in the most ominous fashion all three have played brilliantly and declared their desire to stay there.

i wouldn't bring in mutu if we got miccoli back though.

 

[Dominic]

What makes me wonder about these co/ownership deals though, which teams owes how much of the player? Or is it simply 50/50? Does Juve have the upper hand, by including a clause in the contract?

If these deals are 50/50 and both teams want a player like Chiellini, things could get really ugly.. no?

 

[Alexi-10]

++ [ originally posted by Dominic ] ++
What makes me wonder about these co/ownership deals though, which teams owes how much of the player? Or is it simply 50/50? Does Juve have the upper hand, by including a clause in the contract?

If these deals are 50/50 and both teams want a player like Chiellini, things could get really ugly.. no?

Co-ownership of players is used frequently in transfers because if you offer 50% of a player plus cash to a club in change for a good player your a more likely to get the player because it is cheaper way to get players and benefits both the clubs. Juve don't really have the upper hand in Chiellini's contract because he seem's to be enjoying playing regularly for Fiorentina and at the moment there is no room for him in Juve. When the co-ownership contract runs out the team that offers the most amount of cash will get the player or say if Juve dont need Chiellini for what ever reason they can sell him to Fiorentina for full ownership of Chiellini. Does that answer your question?