There is a middle ground between cultural relativism and cultural imperialism. My impression is that you're dipping into the second category which is utopian and brings a plethora of negative consequences with it. It seems like you're writing from a kantian perspective in regards to universal human rights, so you have a normative instilled. What you're writing and how you're writing it is exactly the problem of the concept of human rights and why it isn't applicable in international law today. States in Western Europe such as Italy, France, Hungary and Bulgaria have in the last year failed to treat people of a certain ethnicity with any degree of dignity - once you betray your own ideals it becomes a futile task to bash someone else over the head with them.
There is a middle ground, you're right about that. And I am well aware that human rights, in the past, have been designed by western states. But I still think they should apply universally.
And yes, I do have a normative instilled. It is not a problem however. In fact, it's unavoidable.
But the really interesting part is where you said that Italy and France (I'd hardly call Hungary and Bulgaria Western Europe) have failed to treat people of a certain ethnicity with any degree of dignity. I can guess as to what you're referring, but I'm curious. Explain.
- - - Updated - - -
It's a quick dick measuring tool for the self perceived western intelligentsia
It is, but I did not mean it that way. An expat studying history and talking about cultural relativism and cultural imperialism is hardly surprising. That's why I asked.
- - - Updated - - -
Henry is a cool dude especially because of his Arsenal past!!
It's his
only past. Without Arsenal (and to a certain amount the French national team) Henry would have had a very average career.