I'm also against ethanol as it drives up food prices, so hopefully they will scrap that program and use the money to fund the wind power projects. Perhaps give some incentive for the Plaines' farmers to work with such companies.
I'm also against ethanol as it drives up food prices, so hopefully they will scrap that program and use the money to fund the wind power projects. Perhaps give some incentive for the Plaines' farmers to work with such companies.
Duh. The problem is you have to have significant wind on your farm in order to have functioning wind turbines on the land. That and you need a lot of land.
Duh. The problem is you have to have significant wind on your farm in order to have functioning wind turbines on the land. That and you need a lot of land.
It's cheaper once you get the turbines up and going. But a significant wind farm, say 50 turbines, can cost $60 million plus land purchasing costs. The benefits come in the long run, which is why significant subsidies would be very beneficial to getting wind going.
That and more statistical research done to combat the false aviary threat that is spread by the yuppies. And rich people off the Cod need to get their heads outta the asses and let us throw up some offshore farms.
They still produce nuclear waster. They just produce less of it. And until we're turning our nuclear waste into glass (France does it) it's not a good idea to seriously invest in nuclear technology especially when our only storage facility happens to reside over one of the largest aquifers in the country.