What Are You Doing Right Now? (300 Viewers)
- Thread starter ßöмßäяðîëя
- Start date
- Tags gay space iliveforfinasteride iliveforjuve is not white loldevil size queens sweet matt is sweet errwhere virgin devil
"wokeism" 
Brother, these are made up bogeymen that are necessary for right wing newspapers to sell issues and get clicks. I've not seen anybody describe themselves as 'woke' in an unironic way for at least ten years. That it's become a popular word in common parlance is entirely from reactionary talking heads who need something to react to.
It doesn't exist in real life
- - - Updated - - -
I'm both. Or neither.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh shit, I didn't realise I was a couple of pages behind and everybody already said what I just did. My bad, as you were
Brother, these are made up bogeymen that are necessary for right wing newspapers to sell issues and get clicks. I've not seen anybody describe themselves as 'woke' in an unironic way for at least ten years. That it's become a popular word in common parlance is entirely from reactionary talking heads who need something to react to.
It doesn't exist in real life
- - - Updated - - -
I'm both. Or neither.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh shit, I didn't realise I was a couple of pages behind and everybody already said what I just did. My bad, as you were
OP
"wokeism"
Brother, these are made up bogeymen that are necessary for right wing newspapers to sell issues and get clicks. I've not seen anybody describe themselves as 'woke' in an unironic way for at least ten years. That it's become a popular word in common parlance is entirely from reactionary talking heads who need something to react to.
It doesn't exist in real life
- - - Updated - - -
I'm both. Or neither.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh shit, I didn't realise I was a couple of pages behind and everybody already said what I just did. My bad, as you were
Brother, these are made up bogeymen that are necessary for right wing newspapers to sell issues and get clicks. I've not seen anybody describe themselves as 'woke' in an unironic way for at least ten years. That it's become a popular word in common parlance is entirely from reactionary talking heads who need something to react to.
It doesn't exist in real life
- - - Updated - - -
I'm both. Or neither.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh shit, I didn't realise I was a couple of pages behind and everybody already said what I just did. My bad, as you were
They may not call themselves woke but they perfectly fit the description.
- - - Updated - - -
I only copied the title of the article so that people would know what it's about.
My only input was "why the fuck are first graders learning this shit?". That conversation should be reserved for teenagers.
OP
Lol, it's not semantics.
There are underlying reasons to be found liable or not liable.
The headline implies that the court looked at the class material and decided children can in fact be taught this stuff.
This is not what happened.
The court first examined whether the child had suffered any damages. It did not. The court therefore decided there could be no liability.
This is not a small difference.
It's stuff like this that is used by right wing politicians to make you believe we will wake up in a crazy woke world tomorrow, whatever that may be.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
There are underlying reasons to be found liable or not liable.
The headline implies that the court looked at the class material and decided children can in fact be taught this stuff.
This is not what happened.
The court first examined whether the child had suffered any damages. It did not. The court therefore decided there could be no liability.
This is not a small difference.
It's stuff like this that is used by right wing politicians to make you believe we will wake up in a crazy woke world tomorrow, whatever that may be.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
Yes, I don't disagree with you one bit on that. It's clear that the article is biased as fuck.
We all know that media outlets push certain narratives, some more subtly than others. However, my point was it's ridiculous that kids that young are being taught all this gender nonsense. That's clearly a teacher with an agenda. The media being the media can't be your takeaway from that article.
We all know that media outlets push certain narratives, some more subtly than others. However, my point was it's ridiculous that kids that young are being taught all this gender nonsense. That's clearly a teacher with an agenda. The media being the media can't be your takeaway from that article.
OP