JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,884
Meh, a little radioactivity never hurt anyone.

I noticed the west coast of the US freaking out about their tuna and other seafood, but tbh you'd have to eat so much for the radioactivity to be a problem that naturally occurring chemicals in food are already going to be causing you a problem. In short, don't worry about it. You mobile phone is already frying you far more.
 
Dec 31, 2008
22,910
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...down-adds-to-tepco-water-management-woes.html
Meh, a little radioactivity never hurt anyone.

I noticed the west coast of the US freaking out about their tuna and other seafood, but tbh you'd have to eat so much for the radioactivity to be a problem that naturally occurring chemicals in food are already going to be causing you a problem. In short, don't worry about it. You mobile phone is already frying you far more.
LOL

so let's just ignore the fact that a large ecosystem is badly fucked for a long term.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,884
The first point was sarcastic. The second part, people should not worry about scaremongering, your seafood is not glowing yellow. The US and France were firing nuclear bombs into the Pacific 50+ years ago, and Caesium-137 isotopes are already in your food.

Locally of course, Fukushima is a massive problem. The Japanese need to get that under control because inside a few years the majority of damage can be absorbed.
 

Lapa

FLY, EAGLES FLY
Sep 29, 2008
20,044
Lapa, holdin' it down :touched:
How's it going dude? Still not drinking enough?

Total calorie intake is around 1800, no carbs and minimum fat. I shave a further 800-1000 calories off per day with Work outs and bike rides.
Drink 12 beers every day and you only need to "intake" 1380 calories some other way. :tup:

OOPS! 12 beers = something like 1400 calories. So you only need to intake 400. Not bad. :wine:

You don't want to see it coming back up. :inter:
:lol:
 
Dec 31, 2008
22,910
The first point was sarcastic. The second part, people should not worry about scaremongering, your seafood is not glowing yellow. The US and France were firing nuclear bombs into the Pacific 50+ years ago, and Caesium-137 isotopes are already in your food.

Locally of course, Fukushima is a massive problem. The Japanese need to get that under control because inside a few years the majority of damage can be absorbed.
radioactivity in the fish is not really a big concern.

the concern is that they took two fucking years to act and avoid damage to such a big extent.

- - - Updated - - -

edit: I meant that people getting worried about their food being contaminated across the Pacific should not be the main concern. But saying that it's not a big deal because there is already some caesium is stupid even if the health effects to us may not be much different than before. It's just more contamination which will be retained in that environment for a long time.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,749
Thin the herd...

:lol:

The first point was sarcastic. The second part, people should not worry about scaremongering, your seafood is not glowing yellow. The US and France were firing nuclear bombs into the Pacific 50+ years ago, and Caesium-137 isotopes are already in your food.

Locally of course, Fukushima is a massive problem. The Japanese need to get that under control because inside a few years the majority of damage can be absorbed.
But think of the awesome MEGAtuna that will revitalize the Japanese economy with:
1. Ridonkulous sushi products
2. Future monster movies to revive Godzilla's career
3. New lines of anime books and action figures
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 350)