WC 2006: Group B (6 Viewers)
- Thread starter JCK
- Start date
poor T&T they didnt deserve to be beaten by 2-0. Scoreline just faltters the english team although they had more chances. But the soca warriors just fought for the whole game and had some decent counters here n there and threatended the defence.
good to see rooney back playing and the injury doesnt look to harm him. Arron lennon played well so did crouch.
good to see rooney back playing and the injury doesnt look to harm him. Arron lennon played well so did crouch.
Erik said:
It maybe many things but it is definitely not gay. I've never seen a gay man do that. Gay men have a sense of rythm and style... 
NOS has some fetish with homosexuality as well anyway
. It might be me, but they seem to show a lot of documentaries about the subject. Some that are obviously meant to be shocking, but most are just plain boring.
Seven said:
I was also convinced about that till I saw that horrible bare backing documentary on NOS. Gross. Even worse was how some of them glorified aids.. there are just no words for such imbecilic behaviour. I'd go as far as saying you do a good deed by killing people like them.
NOS has some fetish with homosexuality as well anyway. It might be me, but they seem to show a lot of documentaries about the subject. Some that are obviously meant to be shocking, but most are just plain boring.
NOS has some fetish with homosexuality as well anyway
. It might be me, but they seem to show a lot of documentaries about the subject. Some that are obviously meant to be shocking, but most are just plain boring.
And the whole barebacking culture has little to do with gays in essence... Not that I strongly relate to the 'gay community' anyway, the whole cult of dramaqueers can be shipped off to a foreign country for all I care...
This group is probably the worst so far in terms of strikers as only 1 goal by Crouch has been scored by a striker.
England won 2-0 is the only comment i can make from that match. You hear comments like its a mark of a good team that you win playing badly but that inly counts in a league competition imo. If England do not step up they are are out by quarter finals
Sweden give so much endeavour but very little quality
I mean Alback is a joke for a striker. The crosses up until the goal were so atrocious
England won 2-0 is the only comment i can make from that match. You hear comments like its a mark of a good team that you win playing badly but that inly counts in a league competition imo. If England do not step up they are are out by quarter finals
Sweden give so much endeavour but very little quality
I mean Alback is a joke for a striker. The crosses up until the goal were so atrocious
Oh come on, we absolutely pummeled them for the entire second half, creating chance after chance that should have been finished. With better finishing its no exaggeration we could have won 6-0 easily! And rooney's back, and aaron lennon looked good.. I mean I was delighted. The atmosphere in the bar when Crouchoudinho scored was just absolutely awe inspiring. Love it
Katil said:
Na all teams have pretty much sucked. Though remember both Paraguay and T&T are extremly defensive teams. No real excuse but still.. Sweden likes to be dominated.
Trinidad is defensive because they have no other choice. They can't keep the ball longer than 10 seconds, if so much, seriously.