Walter Mazzarri - Manager - Napoli (7 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,984
Why not play Bon-Barz-Chiello?
Have you seen what happens when Bonucci gets sucked out wide? He gets owned. I would never play him on the side of a three-man defense, it would be a disaster.

Zaccardo makes more sense for that role, as horrible as it sounds.

He'll come and start.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,984
With a proper RWB (Isla/Cassani, f.e.) Bonucci could be nice.
Don't agree. For that RCB role in the 3-5-2 you need to be mobile and have good tackling skills. You also have to read the game well. Look at Grava for Napoli, he runs his ass off and can tackle hard. Bones isn't that sort of player and Mazzarri knows that.

Bones will be in the center, Zaccardo out right. Guaranteed.
 

Flamez

Senior Member
Feb 7, 2011
1,991
Don't agree. For that RCB role in the 3-5-2 you need to be mobile and have good tackling skills. You also have to read the game well. Look at Grava for Napoli, he runs his ass off and can tackle hard. Bones isn't that sort of player and Mazzarri knows that.

Bones will be in the center, Zaccardo out right. Guaranteed.
We'll see then. I think this would be lovely:

Buffon
Bonucci/Sorensen - Barzagli/Bonucci - Chiellini
Cassani - Montolivo/Marchisio - Mascherano - De Ceglie/Coentrão (I know this wont happen, but it's just me trying to accept Mazzarri)
Krasic - Matri - Aguero

Hazard and Giovinco as supersubs. :D

Wow, now that I thinked twice, Giovinco could stay. :weee:
Btw, Quagliarella will really stay if we get Mazzarri?

Oh yeah, and in this system I think we would see Marchisio playing another position, the wingbacks. I always thought he has some qualities of a FB, so I think he could be quite nice as a WB. :D
 

Albo

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2009
11,463
IMO Sørensen could be backup in three-man defence but I wouldn't take the risk of making him a starter next season.
Yep man you are right , it's risk to make Sorensen starter but also Zaccardo would be risk (I mean he isn't type of player what wee need) .
And yes i agree Barzagli-Bonucci-Chiellini > Zaccardo-Bonucci-Chiellini

But if we are going to play 3 man defence , why dont go after Sakho he is RB/CB Thuram type player :

Sakho - Bonucci - Chiellini
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,984
Yep man you are right , it's risk to make Sorensen starter but also Zaccardo would be risk (I mean he isn't type of player what wee need) .
And yes i agree Barzagli-Bonucci-Chiellini > Zaccardo-Bonucci-Chiellini

But if we are going to play 3 man defence , why dont go after Sakho he is RB/CB Thuram type player :

Sakho - Bonucci - Chiellini
Sakho is left-footed and would play in Chiellini's role.
 

Albo

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2009
11,463
Ivanovic is not on the market, I assume.

Nice players for that role would be Zapata or Otamendi (Porto).
When i saied on market i mean player wich we have chance to get , and he didn't renew his contrat yet .

Otamendi is NON-EU .

We weren't linked with Zapata for long time , i would like to have him here .
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,174
Is it true? Is this turd of a coach really going to be coaching us next season? :sergio: :wallbang:

Will we have to play 3-5-2? We don't even have the players required for that pathetic/ridiculous formation.
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,174
Let's hope he is flexible and willing to adopt a 4-4-2, 4-3-3, or 4-3-2-1 formation.

I see 3-5-2 being a massive failure with the players we have; it would cost us too much to build a quality team capable of playing that formation.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,984
He's not, he always reverts back to 3-5-2. Even with Samp the 4-4-2 he switched to failed, as Badass said.

Anything other than that and Mazzarri becomes as useful as a beached whale.
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,526
I'd like to get Agger if we ever play that formation. Might as well get some lasagna and wine because it'd be nice to get wined and dined before we get fucked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 5)