Vincenzo Iaquinta (29 Viewers)

TrezJuve · Apr 26, 2013

... He was frustrating, whinging each time he lost the ball, missing some good chances, but sometimes he put them away. He was never clinical.

Nzoric · Apr 26, 2013

I agree. In January / February where our attackers couldn't do shit, we could've given him a go to see what he can do. That is, if he wasn't injured during those months.

- - - Updated - - -

Cheesio said:

I'm sorry, the current batch of attackers have lead me to abuse the word "clinical"

. I mean clinical in the same way Matri is, perhaps slightly better. He has much better technique than Matri and the workload can't even be compared. He knew how to move as a striker too.

I'm not sure what I think of Llorente, if he can regain his 11/12 form, that would be spectacular. As a type of player, Iaq definitely suits this Juventus better than Llorente.

K.O. · Apr 26, 2013

Juventino[RUS];4143336 said:

Definitely. No doubt.

Quaglia18 · Apr 26, 2013

DAT backheel, that finish. TECHNIQUE. CLINICAL. :sheik:

Suns · Apr 26, 2013

Dude has been chilling for 2 years collecting that fat pay check.

Turk_Bianconero · Apr 26, 2013

He is the economic gap.

Tommy · Apr 26, 2013

Turk_Bianconero said:

am0110 · Apr 26, 2013

Van Helsing · Apr 26, 2013

Nzoric said:

Why wouldn't I be serious? Iaquinta was a well rounded and pretty clinical striker. His workload on the pitch was massive, too. A younger Iaq without the injuries would be a fantastic addition to the squad. Better than Llorente imo.

Bianconero81 · Apr 27, 2013

@ clinical. This guy isn't even better than Quag. His career averages suggest that he was a 1 goal in every 3.3 games type of guy. Nothing special at all.

He has contributed fuck all to the club for the past 3 seasons; just been collecting money to pay for his coke snorting habit. A useless and annoying beanpole.

Kasaki · Apr 27, 2013

Bianconero81 said:

His stats are actually pretty decent, he was hardly a bad player just always unfit. Bit of a leecher but what do you want him to do when his career isn't assured?

Bjerknes · Apr 27, 2013

Nzoric said:

He was always overrated, thank you.

Mr Chocolate · Apr 27, 2013

it would have been better to play him than to get anelka

Bianconero81 · Apr 27, 2013

Kasaki said:

Decent. Nothing more, nothing less. Just like Giovinco. A good guy to have as a 5'th choice striker, and that's about it. I never liked him, and always thought he was a poor scorer, but a hardworking striker.

pitbull · Apr 27, 2013

Was a monster in that Udinese CL season 2005/06, pretty much the single most important player in the team, scored a goal almost every game, imo way better than di Natale while he was in Udine.