Ken, if you fail to see Amauri as a problem then you will fail to see the overall problem. You speak of mediocrity yet he is the epitome of it. We need a new striker to bang in goals consistently. I mean an actual striker to does what he gets paid to do.
How do you know Immobile is ready for a dependent role in our first team. I guess if you are ok with an injury stricken IQ, a living drought of goals Amauri, a very young Immobile and an aging DP with trez leaving then of course you fail to see the problem. For one reason or another, I'm not sure why.
So according to you, we've had a depth problem for our striker position for years now? Since the strikers we have don't suffice for next year, when we might play with a single striker, have been filling the roles of both strikers the past years.
You sound like the single striker system would give us trouble up front all of a sudden, when as far as I'm aware, it would mean playing one less striker. Depth really isn't the problem here, far from it.
About the quality of Amauri & Co. : I know they're not world beater and I know you're about the biggest Amauri critic around, but we have these problems on so many positions, it's silly to focus on the striker position. I would love to have a new starting striker if the funds suffice, obviously, but you can't possibly insist on buying 2 strikers.
We don't even have a proper LB, RB, second CB, passing midfielder, wingers to play that 4-2-3-1, let alone have good backups, so really, the depth of our striker position is the least of our problems, don't you think?
I'm really not the one missing the point here.