The Wish List and General Discussion Thread (14 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,029
They dislike Criscito because they believe he turned his back on the club when in fact we turned our backs on him by loaning him out to Genoa, not giving him a fair chance.
Not me.

I wanted him before but then every time I watched him I saw nothing special and I think he's too weak to play as a fullback while he doesn't have many strong points at all.

-He is way too weak to be a fullback. He can't win a duel while holding the ball and running. Way too skinny, that may change but who knows. De Rossi was skinny as hell but at least he turned into a monster. I don't believe Criscito will follow his footsteps.
- His crosses are a long range ones as he never really goes forward that much (like the old Zambrotta) and I don't like that.
- His play is simple and his passes are short, 10 meters at most
- Not a strong shot at all
- Pricey

I think better players are out there. He has the potential but I wouldn't go after him as it would be a huge gamble for not a small amount of money. We had too many weak fullbacks already, we need someone good now.
 

giovanotti

ONE MAN ARMY
Aug 13, 2004
13,725
Not me.

I wanted him before but then every time I watched him I saw nothing special and I think he's too weak to play as a fullback while he doesn't have many strong points at all.

-He is way too weak to be a fullback. He can't win a duel while holding the ball and running. Way too skinny, that may change but who knows. De Rossi was skinny as hell but at least he turned into a monster. I don't believe Criscito will follow his footsteps.
- His crosses are a long range ones as he never really goes forward that much (like the old Zambrotta) and I don't like that.
- His play is simple and his passes are short, 10 meters at most
- Not a strong shot at all
- Pricey

I think better players are out there. He has the potential but I wouldn't go after him as it would be a huge gamble for not a small amount of money. We had too many weak fullbacks already, we need someone good now.
Agreed here!
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,277
Not me.

I wanted him before but then every time I watched him I saw nothing special and I think he's too weak to play as a fullback while he doesn't have many strong points at all.

-He is way too weak to be a fullback. He can't win a duel while holding the ball and running. Way too skinny, that may change but who knows. De Rossi was skinny as hell but at least he turned into a monster. I don't believe Criscito will follow his footsteps.
- His crosses are a long range ones as he never really goes forward that much (like the old Zambrotta) and I don't like that.
- His play is simple and his passes are short, 10 meters at most
- Not a strong shot at all
- Pricey

I think better players are out there. He has the potential but I wouldn't go after him as it would be a huge gamble for not a small amount of money. We had too many weak fullbacks already, we need someone good now.
So you want your left-back making cross-field through balls and 50-yard passes all the time instead of keeping things simple?

Sorry, but not everyone is built like Roberto Carlos.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
Simple is good. We need simple because no one on our team minus maybe 2 can keep things simple. We over complicate things.

I'm tired of useless long balls and hopeless crosses.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,029
Simple is good. We need simple because no one on our team minus maybe 2 can keep things simple. We over complicate things.

I'm tired of useless long balls and hopeless crosses.
Watch his passing. If he was here he'd pass the ball to either Legro or Melo. There is no third solution for him. That leads to nowhere.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
Unless Inter sign Kolarov because they are selling Maicon (which wouldn't surprise me at all).
Why would they sell Maicon? What sense does that make? They are already stacked and strong, no need to add millions on top of the millions Moratti is going to give them this summer. Selling Maicon would be the dumbest thing they would do and I don't see Mou allowing him to leave


So...in theory, they keep Maicon and get Kolarov then we go after Davide. They don't get Kolarov then the team that does get him needs to be Juventus.
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
Why would they sell Maicon? What sense does that make? They are already stacked and strong, no need to add millions on top of the millions Moratti is going to give them this summer. Selling Maicon would be the dumbest thing they would do and I don't see Mou allowing him to leave
It's just a gut feeling I have.

So...in theory, they keep Maicon and get Kolarov then we go after Davide. They don't get Kolarov then the team that does get him needs to be Juventus.
Juve should certainly make an attempt for one of the two.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 13)