because it's delusional thinking we'll buy players costing 40-55m € even with Hiddink as coach. We can't compete with clubs like Real, Chelsea...Ozil and Silva maybe but Villa? Come on!
because it's delusional thinking we'll buy players costing 40-55m € even with Hiddink as coach. We can't compete with clubs like Real, Chelsea...Ozil and Silva maybe but Villa? Come on!
I'm not saying I'm not but a coach at 4m and is easier to get than a player that would cost 40m+ and earning 4-5m a season. A good coach can do some good with good players. Wasting all our budget on one player wouldn't make sense.
I'm not saying I'm not but a coach at 4m and is easier to get than a player that would cost 40m+ and earning 4-5m a season. A good coach can do some good with good players. Wasting all our budget on one player wouldn't make sense.
our board is more likely to splash 35 million on villa and pay him 5 million a season, than splash 5 million on a manager. thier previous records show that so what makes you think it's any different now?
Well when you consider how many positions need improved after this year (more than last year) then that changes the whole dynamics of where we splurge. We patched a bunch of wholes last year that are now leaking...take into account we need a RB, LB, CB, CM, AM and ST then suddenly 25-30m on one player doesn't seem so glorious.
Well when you consider how many positions need improved after this year (more than last year) then that changes the whole dynamics of where we splurge. We patched a bunch of wholes last year that are now leaking...take into account we need a RB, LB, CB, CM, AM and ST then suddenly 25-30m on one player doesn't seem so glorious.