The Wish List and General Discussion Thread (16 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
But wouldn't you say you guys are already overloaded in the strikers department?

I mean, i personally think the defense should be a much bigger priority.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
88,992
I do.

As for Quagliarella, even though it's Tuttosport it's very likely that's going to happen.It won't be Iaquinta going because I guess we have Lippi on our way next year who loves him.

But as for the actual tranfer of Quag I'm not so sure what to think...but the only idea that runs through my head is that we're counting on 4-2-3-1 where he could rotate with Camo (who misses a lot).I think he even played for Italy on that position.

Quagliarella/Camo-Diego-Giovinco/Del Piero

Amauri/Trez
 

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
68,934
Lucho costed more so Secco is not the one to be blamed.

I remember Porto wanted 18mln euros for him.
but that was like going for poulsen over xabi because he was cheaper. Jees we're so cheap. i can see us pussying out of buying silva and diego and settling for el hadji diouf instead because he's cheaper or he's 'faster'
yet we can afford to spend 18 mill euros on a striker in amauri? doesnt make any sense what so ever
 

Ahmed

Principino
Sep 3, 2006
47,928
No...Liverpool did not want to sell Xabi until they could get Gareth Barry...Villa priced him out of Pool's plans, and the same happened with us...
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
88,992
but that was like going for poulsen over xabi because he was cheaper. Jees we're so cheap. i can see us pussying out of buying silva and diego and settling for el hadji diouf instead because he's cheaper or he's 'faster'
yet we can afford to spend 18 mill euros on a striker in amauri? doesnt make any sense what so ever
What's so hard to understand that we couldn't afford more.It's a known fact that Porto is a greedy club.

We didn't go after Poulsen because Xabi was too expensive but because Liverpool didn't want to sell him and no, we are not going to buy El Hadji Diouf this summer.
 

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
68,934
What's so hard to understand that we couldn't afford more.It's a known fact that Porto is a greedy club.

We didn't go after Poulsen because Xabi was too expensive but because Liverpool didn't want to sell him and no, we are not going to buy El Hadji Diouf this summer.
ofcourse we were able to afford lucho if what you're claiming about the 18 mill euro price tag is true, especially since we spent over 30 mill on 3 midfielders (tiago/almiron/sissoko) in a 6 month period 2 of whom are fair to say have flopped. It doesnt even make sense
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
88,992
Not much but just because it's Tuttosport. :D

I'd like to see 4-3-2-1...the one that I have mentioned like 124 times already but I think we're going to see something like instead.

Buffon

X-Chiellini-Cannavaro-X

Marchisio-Sissoko

Quagliarella-Diego-Giovinco/Del Piero

Amauri​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 13)