The Old Mod Thread (3 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
Ok, thanks for confirming you are trolling, you got me good.
Don't think you're getting out of this one. Why is it funny to disregard Europe's history, but is it not okay to say Muhammad sucked dick? Even if you obviously don't agree with the latter?

ßüякε;2048516 said:
Because my saying Belgium doesn't exist is obviously untrue. Belgium exists, hell I've been there!

But if you can't substantiate sexual claims, that's just slanderous.
Saying that a nigger is a monkey is obviously untrue as well. Good luck with that.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
ßüякε;2048521 said:
Sure it does, because a group of people sharing the same culture, history, and language could define a nation, and thus, a race.
They COULD define a nation. Doesn't mean a nation is a race. And "race' is most commonly used in a biological sense anyway.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,501
Don't think you're getting out of this one. Why is it funny to disregard Europe's history, but is it not okay to say Muhammad sucked dick? Even if you obviously don't agree with the latter?
Dude, you are really beyond weird, this is my last post on this BS.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
ßüякε;2048530 said:
But you aren't a racist.
I'm not saying a nigger is a monkey. But you say that it's alright if it's blatantly not true. Well it's blatantly not true. You think I can say it?
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
I think Burke got you Seven.

Burke says Belgium doesn't exist.


You call him a racist.


Then you proceed to contradict yourself by saying that a race is different than a nationality

Therefore going by your logic. "Belgium doesn't exist" cannot be a racist statement.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
More like creeped out.
You honestly believe there's a difference? On what basis?

ßüякε;2048548 said:
No, I KNOW you can say it, provided you get your pronunciations correct.

Why should I tell you what is or is not okay to say?
You're a moderator. It's what you do all day on this very forum ;).
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
I think Burke got you Seven.

Burke says Belgium doesn't exist.


You call him a racist.


Then you proceed to contradict yourself by saying that a race is different than a nationality

Therefore going by your logic. "Belgium doesn't exist" cannot be a racist statement.
No. A race does not equal a nation. But that does not mean that insulting a nation cannot be racist. The two tend to be connected. I do agree that nationalistic or fascist would have been a better word. I can use that from now on if you want.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,151
I think Burke got you Seven.

Burke says Belgium doesn't exist.


You call him a racist.


Then you proceed to contradict yourself by saying that a race is different than a nationality

Therefore going by your logic. "Belgium doesn't exist" cannot be a racist statement.
BLOOM!
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
ßüякε;2048557 said:
Exactly, here, there are rules.

I don't give a flying asshat what you say over there, verbally.
A democracy = a forum.

Think about that for a second.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)