The Mod Thread ("because for some reason,you think we actually care") (14 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
Don't we all?



Pot calling the kettle black, huh? For those same reasons, you'll never become a moderator even on a power puff girls forum.



Same could be said about you. You're basing this on Tahir's internet persona, if i had to do the same with you, i could label you a menace to society & that you deserve the gas chamber.

You don't know the first thing about Tahir as a person, so please spare us with rash conclusions like that.

:howler:
 
Sep 1, 2002
12,745
I am not in anyway prudish- not that I think there is anything too wrong with that- but would it be possible to have a rule implemented to stop this proliferation of sexual images being used in avatars?

They really are making this place look tacky, where I gave always though it looked classy.
 

Bozi

The Bozman
Administrator
Oct 18, 2005
22,747
Sure,next we can enforce a rule where everyone has to post their picture in a suit,refer to del neri as "sir" and make no gay jokes over tea
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,758
I am not in anyway prudish- not that I think there is anything too wrong with that- but would it be possible to have a rule implemented to stop this proliferation of sexual images being used in avatars?

They really are making this place look tacky, where I gave always though it looked classy.
I kind of have to agree with you here. As a guy, it's not like I don't like it on a focused level. But on a macro level, they do, in aggregate, make this site look like the home for a bunch of horny 14-year-old boys. Which is never a good branding strategy.

Of course, maybe 96% of the posters here are horny 14-year-old boys... :confused:
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,535
I kind of have to agree with you here. As a guy, it's not like I don't like it on a focused level. But on a macro level, they do, in aggregate, make this site look like the home for a bunch of horny 14-year-old boys. Which is never a good branding strategy.

Of course, maybe 96% of the posters here are horny 14-year-old boys... :confused:
Well, technically all buyers of Playboy are 18 and above so that argument is chucked out the window :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 14)