The Invisible Man (1 Viewer)

Chxta

Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
Nov 1, 2004
12,088
#1
Whenever he went to church, Alfredo di Stefano, Real Madrid's unbending patriarch, used to offer a prayer for the fitness of one of his club's players. It was not Zinedine Zidane, Ronaldo or even Luis Figo, but a man who never wore the mantle of a galactico: Claude Makelele.

Claude Makelele
Claude Makelele: his efforts have transformed Chelsea's midfield


If Jose Mourinho ever prayed for the man from Kinshasa, it, like most things the Chelsea manager has asked for, has been granted. At the age of 32, Makelele has played in all but two of Chelsea's Premiership fixtures and has needed neither rest nor to be part of any squad rotation system.

To the Juventus coach, Fabio Capello, he was the one player Chelsea could not have done without. Mourinho called him the most underrated performer in English football and as the hosannas have been handed to Frank Lampard and John Terry, he may have a point but then courting attention was never part of Makelele's style.

As Steve McManaman, his team-mate for three years at Real Madrid, recalled, to the average fan in the Bernabeu Makelele was almost invisible. "From day one it was obvious to the players he was a crucial feature of the team but because he doesn't score 20 goals or do anything visibly fantastic, like beat six men, pass, collect and score, he'll never get the credit he deserves," he said.

''When he moved to Chelsea in September 2003 people said, 'He's invisible, he doesn't do anything', but Frank Lampard had a fantastic season and a lot of that was to do with Claude winning the ball and passing it neatly to him. He's an unfussy, horrible-to-play-against engine-room player. When we trained his reading of the game was so good you couldn't get past him. His role is to break things up, he is very, very appreciated by the players and it's impossible to overstate his importance."

While it was unquestioned at Ciudad Deportiva, the club's training ground, his importance was mostly overlooked in the Bernabeu's boardroom. To the club president, Florentino Perez, Makelele was, to borrow Eric Cantona's phrase, a mere water carrier. His salary of around £14,000 a week was less than a fifth of the galacticos he supplied and when in the summer of 2003 Makelele threatened to go on strike unless his salary was increased - tactics he had used at Celta Vigo - he was sold to Chelsea for what seemed a phenomenal sum for a 30-year-old of £16.6 million.

And yet it was Real Madrid who bore the greatest cost. It had escaped Perez's notice that Makelele had been injured for the defeat to Juventus in the European Cup semi-final in 2003 that spelled the end of Vicente del Bosque's managerial regime. Without him to shore up a midfield overburdened with attackers, Del Bosque's successor, Carlos Queiroz, was left without any protection. Queiroz's solution of moving David Beckham into the centre of the pitch imploded in the spring of 2004.

''I don't regret a thing," reflected Makelele, who found his first months in London hard because of the language barrier. "I took the decision for my financial future and my health. I am not an egotist but a moment came when I had to be because other people were only thinking of themselves and nothing more.

''But it is dangerous when a club pays so much for you because, with this amount, you are not given much time to demonstrate your game." There was, however, less pressure on him at Stamford Bridge than at the Bernabeu when having to replace Fernando Redondo.

''I'd see signs saying: Fernando please come back. But even though I felt I was playing with a Molotov cocktail at my feet, I obliterated everything from my mind. We won La Liga in 2001 and just seemed invincible. We'd pass the ball between ourselves a dozen times and score goals. It was if we had known each other since childhood. We could find one another almost blindfolded."

That he has remained fit and effective at Chelsea may be due as much to his decision to retire from international football than anything else. He missed out on the glory years of French football and by the time he was called up into the 2002 World Cup squad, it was too late. "For that team the victory cycle was finished. It's difficult to reinvent yourself when you have won everything." For the other Blues, Makelele is discovering that the winning has only just begun.

From the Daily Telegraph
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Juventino783

Junior Member
Aug 31, 2004
306
#2
I say always, that Makelele is one of the most important players of chelsea, i watch all matches of Chelsea and i have seen that he is very good. you doesnt see him in the game, but he is there and commands the action of chelsea
 

Dan

Back & Quack
Mar 9, 2004
9,290
#4
Makelele is probably just as good, if not better then Viera. Such an underated player, i always thought so. I knew Madrid would crash without him.
 

Nicole

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2004
7,561
#5
Underrated player? This is a player who CANT pass a ball to a player more then 5 yards away, and seems inept at pass "forward", in my opinion he is the sole reason Chelsea player 4-5-1, because they HAVE to with him there, overrated...greatly...great midfielders are great at defending and attacking...like Vieria, Emerson, Keano, Gerrard, Pirlo even Gattuso to an extent...
 

Dan

Back & Quack
Mar 9, 2004
9,290
#7
++ [ originally posted by Nicole ] ++
Underrated player? This is a player who CANT pass a ball to a player more then 5 yards away, and seems inept at pass "forward", in my opinion he is the sole reason Chelsea player 4-5-1, because they HAVE to with him there, overrated...greatly...great midfielders are great at defending and attacking...like Vieria, Emerson, Keano, Gerrard, Pirlo even Gattuso to an extent...
Dont agree. Makelele is much more solid defensively then any of them. He maybe be only a 5/10 in attack, but he is a 11/10 in defending. I would much rather have a makelele on my team then a Gerrard for sure, or any of the players you said there (apart from pirlo)
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
123,587
#8
++ [ originally posted by Dan ] ++


Dont agree. Makelele is much more solid defensively then any of them. He maybe be only a 5/10 in attack, but he is a 11/10 in defending. I would much rather have a makelele on my team then a Gerrard for sure, or any of the players you said there (apart from pirlo)
Dan my friend, don't argue with her, how can one reply to a post saying that Makelele is overrated? What arguments and facts other than the obvious can you come up with?

I say none, this is why we carry on peacefully in our way and watch some snooker or wank a little :D
 

Dan

Back & Quack
Mar 9, 2004
9,290
#9
++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


Dan my friend, don't argue with her, how can one reply to a post saying that Makelele is overrated? What arguments and facts other than the obvious can you come up with?

I say none, this is why we carry on peacefully in our way and watch some snooker or wank a little :D
Ah yes Jeeks my good old chum, i did forget that i was bickering with someone who considers Totti a gentleman.

Im serious here Nicole, is the Isle of wight backward world? Do you eat cereal for dinner and walk backwards?
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
#12
++ [ originally posted by Nicole ] ++
Underrated player? This is a player who CANT pass a ball to a player more then 5 yards away , and seems inept at pass "forward", in my opinion he is the sole reason Chelsea player 4-5-1, because they HAVE to with him there, overrated...greatly...great midfielders are great at defending and attacking...like Vieria, Emerson, Keano, Gerrard, Pirlo even Gattuso to an extent...
This is what Perez said when he Left Madrid. and It's rubbish.

Makelele is ONE of the reason Chelsea is playing perfect alongside Lampard,Terry. and as Don Said he's 11/10 when it's about defending.
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
#13
++ [ originally posted by Elnur_E65 ] ++
Santago's bosses were just fools to sell him to England. But their biggest mistake was to fire Vicente Del Bosque.
and Loaning Morientes to Monaco then keeping him on the bench then to Anfield.

But seriously your right, Del Bosque was everything in Madrid, I just don't understand how Real's business goes.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
123,587
#14
++ [ originally posted by azzurri7 ] ++


and Loaning Morientes to Monaco then keeping him on the bench then to Anfield.

But seriously your right, Del Bosque was everything in Madrid, I just don't understand how Real's business goes.
Real's business:

Let us sign the pålayer who has most advertisement contracts, no matter how bad he plays he is a star.

Hey we have better players in that position, to hell with them we can loan them and make us look like idiots.

Ok, let us bring them back. Alright but they stay on the bench. Fine!!!

OH!! What happened?? We did not win anything this year. Ah well we will do what we did last year maybe we win.

And so on and so forth.

This is Madrid's policy in a nutshell
 

Nicole

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2004
7,561
#18
++ [ originally posted by Dan ] ++


Ah yes Jeeks my good old chum, i did forget that i was bickering with someone who considers Totti a gentleman.

Im serious here Nicole, is the Isle of wight backward world? Do you eat cereal for dinner and walk backwards?
Yes, they are very back THERE!

Seriously...Makelele is overrated, yes selling him is the reason for Madrid's downfall, but thats only because they tried to replace a defensive midfield with BECKHAM!!

Makelele is a good defensive midfield, but overall he isnt that great. Great midfielders are "complete" players, Makelele can only ever be 50% great.

I'd give him a 9/10 defensively, but a 2/10 for attacking...
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
123,587
#20
Nicole, you really don't make any sense when rating players. purrrleeeeez

Makelele is overrated, Cannavarro is overrated, Totti is a gentleman :wallbang: Stop it FFS
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)