The Financial Situation (86 Viewers)

[Paid-off-Ref]

Somebody call the whambulance! For those who don't know the Agnelli holding company (EXOR) doesn't completely control FIAT. EXOR's stake is around 30% last time I checked. Not that this matters.
What does matter is that FIAT and Juventus aren't the same company! The FIAT board has a legal duty to all of their shareholders, which is to maximize all of their value (increase the stock price). And if that means sponsoring the national team and not Juventus then so be it. Can't believe people cry over this.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Salvatore]

Somebody call the whambulance! For those who don't know the Agnelli holding company (EXOR) doesn't completely control FIAT. EXOR's stake is around 30% last time I checked. Not that this matters.
What does matter is that FIAT and Juventus aren't the same company! The FIAT board has a legal duty to all of their shareholders, which is to maximize all of their value (increase the stock price). And if that means sponsoring the national team and not Juventus then so be it. Can't believe people cry over this.

Whole post, specifically bold part =

 

[Red]

Somebody call the whambulance! For those who don't know the Agnelli holding company (EXOR) doesn't completely control FIAT. EXOR's stake is around 30% last time I checked. Not that this matters.
What does matter is that FIAT and Juventus aren't the same company! The FIAT board has a legal duty to all of their shareholders, which is to maximize all of their value (increase the stock price). And if that means sponsoring the national team and not Juventus then so be it. Can't believe people cry over this.

 

[only-juve]

Somebody call the whambulance! For those who don't know the Agnelli holding company (EXOR) doesn't completely control FIAT. EXOR's stake is around 30% last time I checked. Not that this matters.
What does matter is that FIAT and Juventus aren't the same company! The FIAT board has a legal duty to all of their shareholders, which is to maximize all of their value (increase the stock price). And if that means sponsoring the national team and not Juventus then so be it. Can't believe people cry over this.

Said the same thing many times over and people still think that Fiat and Juve are the same.

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

But but but FIAT and the Agnelli's are disrepktn Juve and sidin wif da eneMy!!111

 

[Mark]

130m from the family till 2015?

 

[Fake Melo]

FFP my man. FFP.

 

[Dostoevsky]

That's... not really much, no?

 

[Mark]

We could decide to use it in the 1st or 1st couple of years and then use the rest with the stadium money and Agüero shirt sales money.

 

[yousef_s_e]

that would be good especially if done this season

 

[Hust]

Let us use 100m this summer and 30m next summer to bring Hazard.

 

[only-juve]

130m from the family till 2015?

There is no way they'll pay the whole amount upfront.

My best guess is, they'll pay that amount as installment for 4 years.

32.5 million a year which is still not bad if True.

 

[CAPITANO]

Losses of 95mil

Last year this was 10mil

 

[adriano_c]

10? I think it was way more than that. Something like 40-60?

 

[Juventini 1897]

Download and read this :

http://www.juventus.com/wps/wcm/myconnect/6a31423b-fa0e-4c6a-bc9b-070275b9977d/comunicato+16092011+progettobilancio+eng.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=6a31423b-fa0e-4c6a-bc9b-070275b9977d

 

[Hust]

Is it from the new stadium?

 

[Juventino★★★]

Let us use 100m this summer and 30m next summer to bring Hazard.

Losses of 95mil

Last year this was 10mil

not another jinx...

 

[Hust]

Our team is so much fucking better this year.

 

[Juve Fanatico]

Our team is so much fucking better this year.

 

[Vlad]

I studied financial menagment, so from financial report which you can find on Juventus page situation is not as bad as it seems. The loss of 95 mill is not something that we will have to pay. We had revenues 172 mil in 2010/11, operating cost in amount of 196 mil, amortisation 60 mil, so after calculating those variables we came to an amount of 95 millions. But here is the trick clubs use amortisation just like firms use it and it's to reduce taxes. For those who don't know what amortisation in football means here is an explanation. When a club buys a player for example 20 mil and gives him 5 year contract, they will use it as an amortisation in amount 4 mil a year, and after 5 years player has no value of whatsoever. So if you deduct 60 millions amortisation out of this 95 you have an amount of 30 mil. And given the fact that we have and will spent 120 millions on players in past two seasons which we will pay off annually in amount of around 30 millions starting this year, we shouldn't be alarmed. Don't forget 23 mil we earn less from tv rights, 20-25 mill CL. Also they calculated 79 millions from stadium investment. I don't have time now for more detailed analysis, but those are the basics.