When will we get answers if we don't lynch someone? Wait for the D to reveal himself? I was for no lynch yesterday but I think it was a mistake.
The random we lynch will probably be a C, but it could also be a G. We might get something out of people trying to protect others and we'll narrow down the options (also giving the D a smaller range to choose to investigate from). We'll never get anywhere if we keep going for no lynch.
The game would never liven up if nobody is lynched that is true. I'm not for a no lynch today too, even though it would give the D more time to find the BG, he shouldn't make it public that he's the D until he finds the BG.
Its the first day, its just wild accusations - nothing can be worked out until the lynching/whacking happens. Hoori didn't vote tonight, so im keeping an eye on here.
It's the first time the narrator keeps reporting those who are yet to vote, stop reading too much into it. Many players don't vote especially on the first nights and especially when "no lynch" option already has the most votes. I said who I suspected: Osman, Sabet and Kyle. My vote wouldn't mean much anyway.
So Ms. Ninja, maybe you and the other Gs are banding together to make it look like you’re civilians, even accusing each other just to confuse others but never voting for each other, or changing your votes if you do, and picking off us C’s one by one?
The fact that Katie is going away and not going to participate in the game is also making me raise an eyebrow. If she's a G, and we let her be inactive, she can still contribute to their potential victory by just staying un-lynched at the end.
I was thinking No Lynch was absolutely the dumbest idea to do. As Cs your better off to work off a hunch than to just sit back and see what happens. Now the Gs killed a strong player anyways and Cs are left with no clues whatsoever. Whichever person got lynched at least we would have last words to play off of.