Terrorism (12 Viewers)

[River]

To be honest i think that documentary could actually make people reject it so much they will support bush. Surely would have been better to even it alitte

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Torkel]

++ [ originally posted by River ] ++
To be honest i think that documentary could actually make people reject it so much they will support bush. Surely would have been better to even it alitte

Don't think it would have made a difference, a lot of people would just have written it off as another Moore movie anyways. And don't think Moore really would have been able to even it out either.

 

[Bjerknes]

++ [ originally posted by Torkel ] ++

Well, seems like you're a bit quick in dismissing Moore's film only being biased. Sure, it's biased, but he still brings up several important questions, and highlights several things that Bush could have handled better.

Thats true, but its still a very biased piece of work, which was made for one reason, to destroy Bush.

 

[Zlatan]

And a very good reason it is.

 

[Bjerknes]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++
And a very good reason it is.

Well of course to you.

 

[Alex]

++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Same old stuff again, no new arguments. Michael Moore's documentary was very biased, and frankly a one-sided opinion like this can make it seem like Bush is doing no good in office.

what are you talking about... i haven't seen Michael Moore's doco. That argument was based on other information. Stuff that can be credited as a source.

 

[BarkuZ-yes i am an ass]

Let me speak about this.....Its terrible what happened in Osetia days ago,poor children...but you must understand these Palestinian people...they have their own state and then USA says that Jews will have their state there...they equipe them with modern weapons adn turn around their heads while thousands Palestinians were killed and pushed into camps. And all that cuz of stupid book called "Bible"? Thats like "Mongols" come here with nuclear weapon(Balkan) and say that this land was their before cca 3000 years according to their Bible,and start to kill you and put people in the small getto and make a wall around it. What is my option then? To take the bomb and run into as much people I can? If that is the onley choice to fight the system....YES. Thats my vison of middle east situation. But blowing schools up and kidnapping people that have nothing to do with occupation of Iraq,crushing buildings with Airplanes and such....Im against that.

 

[The Pado]

Any person that would take a baby as a hostage, use children as human shields, or bomb a school has no purpose on this earth, has no god, and is not human. The Russians are right to exterminate. Such people, these baby-killers, must be gutted, burned and have their ashes spread in animal pens.

 

[gray]

++ [ originally posted by barkuss ] ++
And all that cuz of stupid book called "Bible"?

:groan:

 

[Asma]

ouch!

 

[mikhail]

++ [ originally posted by barkuss ] ++
And all that cuz of stupid book called "Bible"?

No, all because of the stupid people who don't understand the message of the Bible, and the evil people who manipulate them in their ignorance.

 

[KB824]

++ [ originally posted by Padovano ] ++
Any person that would take a baby as a hostage, use children as human shields, or bomb a school has no purpose on this earth, has no god, and is not human. The Russians are right to exterminate. Such people, these baby-killers, must be gutted, burned and have their ashes spread in animal pens.

Well, it looks like the theory that terrorists are only after countries who are in the Coalition has been debunked. It now looks like Russia, after two terrorist attacks in the last 2 weeks, will be more pre-emptive when it comes to terrorism.


Can you imagine being a mother or a father who is just outside of the gate after all hell broke loose, and seeing your 6 year old son or daughter running for the gates towards you, crying out your name asking for help, because you're the only person that they can have faith in at that time, and then see a malicious coward with a submachine gun come around the corner and shoot your child in the back.


Chew on that for a while.

 

[gray]

++ [ originally posted by mikhail ] ++
No, all because of the stupid people who don't understand the message of the Bible, and the evil people who manipulate them in their ignorance.

thanks very much John

 

[KB824]

++ [ originally posted by River ] ++
To be honest i think that documentary could actually make people reject it so much they will support bush. Surely would have been better to even it alitte

It was just reported today that Farenheit 9/11 would not be submitted for the Academy Awards as a documentary, but for the best picture nomination.

Why?

the answer is two-fold


#1) It probably would lose against "Super Size Me" in the documentary category

#2) This "documentary" has had holes poked through it by not only Republicans and the conservative media, but some Democrats as well as more liberal outlets such as CNBC, and documentaries are supposed to be based on 100% fact.

 

[Zlatan]

Plus, it's cool to be anti-Bush

 

[KB824]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++
Plus, it's cool to be anti-Bush

Oh, of course its cool to be anti-bush.

Its been that way for a couple of years now.

 

[Zlatan]

Just because it's cool doesnt mean it isnt smart to be anti-Bush.

 

[KB824]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++
Just because it's cool doesnt mean it isnt smart to be anti-Bush.

I didn't say that it wasn't.


All I said was that its been in vogue to be anti-bush for the past couple of years now.

 

[Bjerknes]

++ [ originally posted by Sergio ] ++


Oh, of course its cool to be anti-bush.

Its been that way for a couple of years now.

Even these dumbshits in Hollywood who don't have a clue what goes on in the world have joined the Anti-Bush bandwagon. Not to mention this new "Rock Against Bush" Album that was made just to make money.

 

[KB824]

++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Even these dumbshits in Hollywood who don't have a clue what goes on in the world have joined the Anti-Bush bandwagon. Not to mention this new "Rock Against Bush" Album that was made just to make money.

What I find interesting in all of that, is that Hollywood and the Entertainment Industry in general is part of the tax-bracket that ususally gets coddled by the Republicans to begin with.

And I don't think that its a case of them not knowing, I think that its more or less they've come to a point in their lives, be it financially, mentally, or spiritually, that they can now speak out against what they perceive as injustices and not have to worry about ramifications. Its very easy to speak out in a controversial tone when you've already achieved everything in life that you've set out to do. No such thing as bad publicity. However, if they overstep their bounds, it might, and I stress might, damage their reputation.

Bruce Springsteen has never been for the Republicans, going back to the early 80's when Reagan was in office. Eddie Vedder, whose opinions I would view with more substance than any other celebrity out there, has been anti-Republican for as long as I can remember. Its when the J-Lo's and Ben Affleck's, whose nose is so far up Kerry's Ass he can see what Kerry had for lunch the other day, decide to speak up, and they readily admit that they didn't even vote in 2000, that I take those views with a whole barrel of salt.