Tactics and Formations (15 Viewers)

Jul 20, 2012
20,044
Some interesting stuff in this looking at it from a Juve perspective:

http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2013/dec/18/question-holding-midfielders-changing-role

The stuff about central midfielders returning to being more rounded players (rather than just destroyers or just ball players) would point to Juve being well placed, with Vidal and Pogba, to leap on the 4-2-3-1 bandwagon with the current trend.

Then there is also the observation at the end (which I believe has been brought up here before) of there not being much difference, particularly when in possession, between teams having a defensive midfielder who drops between the two central defenders, and what Juve have, with Bonucci as a permanent fixture between the other defenders.

Of course, just because there is a trend doesn't mean that one ought to try and play the same way as everyone else.

From what I've seen of Man City, who are mentioned a lot in the article, playing Toure and Fernandinho as two fairly energetic central midfielders in a 4-2-3-1 (4-4-2) the game is left so insanely open and there is such a lack of control that you would be running huge risks to play like that every week.


Exactly. Man city play such an open game and that is why they make so many mistakes. I agree with your post but i think that without a holding midfielder or a destroyer the 4-2-3-1 isnt as good.
 

Pirlo's Beard

Junkie Joe Joyce
Oct 2, 2013
11,411
In all seriousness, I think this team would be enough to get us to the Europa semi-finals. And when we're that close to the final in our own stadium, we can bring in most of our first team XI to finish the job


Buffon
Isla Caceres Ogbonna *** Peluso
Nainggolan Marchisio Asamoah
Quags Giovinco/Mirko


The *** is basically a gap which would require a first team player

So, either of our first choice CB 3 can fill in, depending on who's fit and ready.

Alternatively, we can hope Pepe is fit enough for let's say the last 16 tie which is the one after our next tie. And if we land Menez on the cheap we could just 4-3-3 it and then we could use a back line purely made up of our non-starting defenders



Buffon
Isla Caceres Ogbonna Peluso
Radja Marchisio Asamoah
Pepe Quags Menez/Vucinic
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
Haven't seen much mention of it, but there are interesting signs of Conte developing as a coach and Juve having more option in their playing style.

There was the obvious case of him playing 4-3-3 against Real Madrid, but I thought the way he set Juve out to play against Roma was more interesting.

I can't recall many (any?) occasions in Serie A where Conte has set Juve out with the intention of not dominating territory and possession.

I can, however, recall plenty of occasions where I thought it was a mistake for Juve to try and dominate territory and possession because of it leaving Juve looking vulnerable against counter-attacking teams.

I'd be interested to know what it was that prompted the change in approach for that Roma game.

It could be that he thought Roma were a scarier counter-attacking prospect than anything else he had come across in Italy recently, but I'm not convinced that's the case given how he was inclined to face up to Napoli in the last couple of years.

Could also be due to the idea that Juve don't tend to be in their peak condition in January, so the best bet was to avoid being dragged into playing a high-energy, open game.

Or the willingness to play like that may just be another side affect of Juve having much better forwards than they have in recent years. That they can be relied upon to retain possession and allow the team to get up the pitch if they have been defending deep is certainly not something that previous forwards - Vucinic, sometimes, aside - could relied on to do regularly. And, though neither of them scored against Roma, Llorente and Tevez have shown themselves to be more clinical than Juve's forwards in previous seasons, so not feeling the need to create heaps of chances just to score a goal or two could also have given Conte the confidence that Juve could play in a much more defensive manner and still win the game.
 
Jul 20, 2012
20,044
Haven't seen much mention of it, but there are interesting signs of Conte developing as a coach and Juve having more option in their playing style.

There was the obvious case of him playing 4-3-3 against Real Madrid, but I thought the way he set Juve out to play against Roma was more interesting.

I can't recall many (any?) occasions in Serie A where Conte has set Juve out with the intention of not dominating territory and possession.

I can, however, recall plenty of occasions where I thought it was a mistake for Juve to try and dominate territory and possession because of it leaving Juve looking vulnerable against counter-attacking teams.

I'd be interested to know what it was that prompted the change in approach for that Roma game.

It could be that he thought Roma were a scarier counter-attacking prospect than anything else he had come across in Italy recently, but I'm not convinced that's the case given how he was inclined to face up to Napoli in the last couple of years.

Could also be due to the idea that Juve don't tend to be in their peak condition in January, so the best bet was to avoid being dragged into playing a high-energy, open game.

Or the willingness to play like that may just be another side affect of Juve having much better forwards than they have in recent years. That they can be relied upon to retain possession and allow the team to get up the pitch if they have been defending deep is certainly not something that previous forwards - Vucinic, sometimes, aside - could relied on to do regularly. And, though neither of them scored against Roma, Llorente and Tevez have shown themselves to be more clinical than Juve's forwards in previous seasons, so not feeling the need to create heaps of chances just to score a goal or two could also have given Conte the confidence that Juve could play in a much more defensive manner and still win the game.
I agree and our counter attacks look at more dangerous.
 

TheLaz

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
5,536
The 4231 is only trending with big teams around europe. I like to watch Liverpool play it, yes i know they have Suarez, but other then that I really like the fact that they believe in their own qualities and strive to score a goal more then their opponent rather then wait it out and play it safe, as i feel we do far too often. With only a few signings we have the perfect players for 4231.

Dortmund went to the finals of CL last year with this formation and the belief in own youth. Reus, Götze, Lewandowski were all rather unproven players two-three years ago and one season after they took BvB to the finals. For us to take back Berardi and trust him full time is no different then Dortmund putting faith in Reus(back when) but also currently Liverpool in Sterling, Arsenal in Chamberlain, United in Januzaj, Chelsea in Oscar..
 

napoleonic

Senior Member
Sep 7, 2010
4,129
I don't know why italian coaches always have the habit of getting back to employ defensive passive football, have they been doctrined with defensive football since childhood or what?
 

Pirlo's Beard

Junkie Joe Joyce
Oct 2, 2013
11,411
Pretty much every time we lose a game, it's due to the same negative approach.

Key things to look out for.


Our MF gets pressed into oblivion, Pirlo becomes useless and we sit back
We play it around our back 3, when the pressure intensifies, one of our wide CBs pass it to the near wing-back, who has his back to goal.
The Wing back then punts the ball blindly up the pitch, often to the opposition
Our strikers both end up coming so deep, that they are rendered useless



This happens in most of our cup competition games, Conte must have surely learned by now that when we allow teams to keep coming at us again and again, our system does not work

The 'regista' is null and void
We have 1 too many defenders, resulting in our attack being swarmed
Our wing-backs are useless as a counter attacking force, whereas Wingers would be just fine hitting on the break.
 

MikeM

Footballing Hipster celebrating 4th place with Tuz
Sep 21, 2008
12,834
What you said, plus I'll add that I think Llorente has been masking our deficiencies a bit by being an outlet for basically anyone on the pitch and doing such a great job at it currently. Without him, we have to find a way out of our own 3rd without a high ball and we struggle mightily.
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
Juve weren't deep because of being pressed tonight.

Juve went out with the plan to stay pretty deep to deny Roma counter attacks just as they did in the game in Turin (though I don't remember too many complaints about the negative tactics after that game).

The problem - in contrast to the game against Roma in Turin - was that Juve's strikers didn't hold the ball up well enough to allow Juve to get up the pitch and mount attacks in the way there were able to in the previous game against Roma.

Juve either needed to play in the same fashion, but with at least one of Tevez and Llorente, or play a bolder game - which would have risked conceding more counter attacks - but probably would have suited the players that were fielded more.
 

Pirlo's Beard

Junkie Joe Joyce
Oct 2, 2013
11,411
Yeah that's the thing though

Even with our first team, we try to play it out from the back. But under any form of pressure we fail at it mightily. The difference is, we have a 210 pound, 6 foot 5 target to aim for now.

But we can't keep relying on that. Even though 3-5-2 at full strength is doing well for us, i'm a firm believer in scrapping this system entirely. Having 5 defenders AND a regista dropping short to collect 5 yard passes leaves with very few options going forward.

Without Llorente, it's hopefull panic long balls to a striker like Giovinco, who has no hope in hell of winning these balls.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 15)