Summer Mercato season 2024-25 (71 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,043
If you have to choose which one you will choose

Koop (60m) vs Brescianini (13m) + Samardzic(25m) + De Ketalaare (22m)
Koop. I'd rather waste 20 million than 40-60.

- - - Updated - - -

We haven’t even banned Mombly. And honestly I don’t know if that tweet is necessarily bs. Atalanta is very upset about our approaches. Percassi said today that transfer market should be regulated better. They are angry, right or wrong, that one of their assets is trying to force his way to a certain club. So why is this inconceivable that they go for Gonzalez if they lose Lookman too?
Because they'd have to pay him double whta the rest of their players earn?
 

Ronn

Senior Member
May 3, 2012
20,899
Koop. I'd rather waste 20 million than 40-60.

- - - Updated - - -


Because they'd have to pay him double whta the rest of their players earn?
Scamacca is earning 3m net, Zaniolo 2.3m. They can still flex a little especially since we’re throwing 60m at them.
 

Ronn

Senior Member
May 3, 2012
20,899
if they do then i think it will happen only to annoy juve

they don't need nico. he's much better on the right and lookman is mostly a seconda punta or lw for them
I still think Comisso and Percassi working together to get more money from us is the likelier scenario here.
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,043
Scamacca is earning 3m net, Zaniolo 2.3m. They can still flex a little especially since we’re throwing 60m at them.
No they can't. They won't and can't throw their entire salary house overboard because they get a few million extra just once. We might have done that before but they're not that dumb. And they've already splashed 25 mil on Samardzic...
 
Last edited:

juve123

Senior Member
Aug 10, 2017
16,652
Juventus is getting closer to signing Teun Koopmeiners despite Percassi's statements.Giuntoli's latest offer is €52 million plus €6 million in bonuses, nearly reaching the €60 million that Atalanta is asking for.A new meeting between the two clubs might happen soon.

[@tuttosport)
 

Ronn

Senior Member
May 3, 2012
20,899
No they can't. They won't and can't throw their entire salary house overboard because they get a few million extra just once. We might have done that before but they're not that dumb. And they've already splashed 25 mil on Samardzic...
He reportedly asked for 3.6m net. That’s not throwing overboard.
They surely can do that.
 

juve123

Senior Member
Aug 10, 2017
16,652
Progress between Juventus and Roma for Tiago Djalo with the bianconeri wanting €1m for the loan plus €6m on the obligation but Roma want loan with option clause.
(86_longo)
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,043
He reportedly asked for 3.6m net. That’s not throwing overboard.
They surely can do that.
No they can't; paying another player 20% (!) more than your star striker is throwing it overboard.

Plus they already added Samardzic and they're not paying 35-40 million and that salary. That would add up to being more than the incoming transfer sum and also a higher salary burden. They do not have the mans to be taking such risks. For now the CL qualification is an anomaly for them. If they can consistently do it, that's another matter.
 

DanielSz

Senior Member
Sep 6, 2014
14,362
Progress between Juventus and Roma for Tiago Djalo with the bianconeri wanting €1m for the loan plus €6m on the obligation but Roma want loan with option clause.
(86_longo)
who cares what they want

- - - Updated - - -

anyways if juve are able to sell Chiesa I hope they return for Sancho. Fuck Commisso, I’m not paying 40M for Nico, and I like Nico.
 

Stevie

..........
Mar 30, 2003
20,888
who cares what they want

- - - Updated - - -

anyways if juve are able to sell Chiesa I hope they return for Sancho. Fuck Commisso, I’m not paying 40M for Nico, and I like Nico.
Agree. 30m was a good deal for both clubs but Commisso obviously added an extra 10m tax for Juventus and we should never accept that shit.
 
Last edited:

Ronn

Senior Member
May 3, 2012
20,899
No they can't; paying another player 20% (!) more than your star striker is throwing it overboard.

Plus they already added Samardzic and they're not paying 35-40 million and that salary. That would add up to being more than the incoming transfer sum and also a higher salary burden. They do not have the mans to be taking such risks. For now the CL qualification is an anomaly for them. If they can consistently do it, that's another matter.
There’s already a 20% gap between their top earner and the second one.
presenting your opinion as sheer facts doesn’t make you sound smart.
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,043
There’s already a 20% gap between their top earner and the second one.
presenting your opinion as sheer facts doesn’t make you sound smart.
Which was already a downgrade from Zapata... But Scamacca is their star striker and that's 99% of the time the top earner.

You want them to make another upwards jump for a squad player which is the problem... Atalanta don't buy made stars players and that's the move Gonzalez and Commisso are looking for now.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 63)