Summer mercato 2015 (43 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
I dont think Lyon could ever pull a transfer like that. They sold Lloris for €13m (let's have a :lol: on that) and Benzema for €35m.

I don't think Fekir has the hype Benzema had around him before joining Real Madrid.
Its the day before deadline day. Watch them

- - - Updated - - -

Old Lyon could have got €50m, now it depends which rich teams have that lying around to bid against each other on a player they probably don't need.
You know we arent going to get that guy, and lyon on 30 august isnt going to accept a reasonable fee
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
Old Lyon could have got €50m, now it depends which rich teams have that lying around to bid against each other on a player they probably don't need.
thats why im asking. it wonders me that there wasnt rumours about him leaving all summer (or i missed them). i find it hard to believe that EPL teams arent all over him by now. or maybe Lyon prefers to keep him for the CL season and wants to cash in next summer?
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
According to Tuttomercatoweb, Juventus are interested in Lyon playmaker Nabil Fekir.
If Juventus fail to sign Fekir now, they could try to sign him again in January. [TmW]

Who the fuck is this guy ?
According to even bigger shit then Di Marzio, Laudisa, Pedule and mr garbage, we are interested in a better player then draxler


You know, i'm also going to create a huge turd, brb 30 mins
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
41,973
\
Vidal wanted to go to Bayern. We got 37mil for it wich is a reasonable price for a cm that isnt scoring goals.
You are trying way too hard to defend this and it's ridiculous. It was a crap sale.

He was our starting AM. 2 years left on his contract. Our management should have said we'll only sell you if we can get a replacement AM signed. And then they should have told Bayern absolutely no negotiations unless Gotze is available moving the other way. We could sell Vidal next summer if necessary for less money. Even much less money. Keeping him for the year so we actually have a player capable of playing starting AM in the line-up so we don't force a formation change on our coach after our most successful season is the only thing a top club should be doing.

Selling him without wrapping up a top AM is a 100% retarded move. It's not even debatable. Players under contract ask to leave clubs all the time. Clubs say no all the time. It's not like he would have purposefully played like crap if we said no. And our team would be much much better, and much better suited to play 4-3-1-2 today if he was still here.

Bumbling ineptness on the part of the management.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
You are trying way too hard to defend this and it's ridiculous. It was a crap sale.

He was our starting AM. 2 years left on his contract. Our management should have said we'll only sell you if we can get a replacement AM signed. And then they should have told Bayern absolutely no negotiations unless Gotze is available moving the other way. We could sell Vidal next summer if necessary for less money. Even much less money. Keeping him for the year so we actually have a player capable of playing starting AM in the line-up so we don't force a formation change on our coach after our most successful season is the only thing a top club should be doing.

Selling him without wrapping up a top AM is a 100% retarded move. It's not even debatable. Players under contract ask to leave clubs all the time. Clubs say no all the time. It's not like he would have purposefully played like crap if we said no. And our team would be much much better, and much better suited to play 4-3-1-2 today if he was still here.

Bumbling ineptness on the part of the management.
"starting AM" :rofl:

Vidal was a CM, we played him at AM against real and barcelona, to get more power down the central axis, to compensate for pirlo.

He wanted to go so we sold him. Again, he was not an AM, and would absolutely not work like an AM.
 

Boksic

Senior Member
May 11, 2005
13,463
Its come to stage now where we either overpay for someone or we have to give up and stick with 3-5-2. Overpaying is the only option when you leave your dealings until the last day...
 

Collaguazo

Pezuña Brava
Mar 4, 2012
3,610
You are trying way too hard to defend this and it's ridiculous. It was a crap sale.

He was our starting AM. 2 years left on his contract. Our management should have said we'll only sell you if we can get a replacement AM signed. And then they should have told Bayern absolutely no negotiations unless Gotze is available moving the other way. We could sell Vidal next summer if necessary for less money. Even much less money. Keeping him for the year so we actually have a player capable of playing starting AM in the line-up so we don't force a formation change on our coach after our most successful season is the only thing a top club should be doing.

Selling him without wrapping up a top AM is a 100% retarded move. It's not even debatable. Players under contract ask to leave clubs all the time. Clubs say no all the time. It's not like he would have purposefully played like crap if we said no. And our team would be much much better, and much better suited to play 4-3-1-2 today if he was still here.

Bumbling ineptness on the part of the management.
I think Vidal antics during Copa America with his Ferrari really hurt our chances of selling him for a higher fee. 100% agree that we should had sold him after securing an AM.

And now we made the same mistake with Comanche :cry:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 40)