Summer mercato 2015 (16 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Boksic

Senior Member
May 11, 2005
13,412
I just don't think Cuadrado is the man we are going for. Marotta already suggested he is the wrong position.

I still think Gotze is a possibility as is Draxler. Equally, I wouldn't be surprised to see us get Sneijder or Saponara...
 

HAZEM

L'architetto
Apr 22, 2008
8,215
Mata is comfortably better than the other two.

Or were you meaning something else ? :D in terms of who we can get.

- - - Updated - - -



Who's the AM ?

Costa is looking like a long term Ribery replacement for them.
Pastore is the better player.. he can give you this moments of genius. create something out of nothing.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
59,288
I just don't think Cuadrado is the man we are going for. Marotta already suggested he is the wrong position.

I still think Gotze is a possibility as is Draxler. Equally, I wouldn't be surprised to see us get Sneijder or Saponara...
You should be, he explicitly said top AM, he narrowed himself, even if the definitions may vary for some, those two arent considered top choices under any circumstances right now.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
59,288
Pastore is the better player.. he can give you this moments of genius. create something out of nothing.
Mata has like insane right for assisting past 3-4 years, any time he plays regurarly, he gets 20+ assists. Pastore only has like half a season woth of performing well for PSG. He is too inconsistent and soft besides that, would welcome him, but defenitely Mata is the better AM.
 
OP

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
96,049
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #20,406
    Thanks, will rep u later need to spread

    - - - Updated - - -

    Also @Mark @The Cusp or anyone that read or watched marottas interview. Did he say anything about targeting a younger player? Because i thought that is what he said but now i cant seem to find that part
    The one I saw he didn't mention young or top player. I think. :p
     

    HAZEM

    L'architetto
    Apr 22, 2008
    8,215
    Mata has like insane right for assisting past 3-4 years, any time he plays regurarly, he gets 20+ assists. Pastore only has like half a season woth of performing well for PSG. He is too inconsistent and soft besides that, would welcome him, but defenitely Mata is the better AM.
    i am biased ! :D
     

    Xperd

    Allegrophobic Infidel
    Jun 1, 2012
    32,478
    Thanks, will rep u later need to spread

    - - - Updated - - -

    Also @Mark @The Cusp or anyone that read or watched marottas interview. Did he say anything about targeting a younger player? Because i thought that is what he said but now i cant seem to find that part
    He said that he's targeting a younger player for the midfield This excludes TQ.

    He also said 'money isn't a problem if it's an investment for the future'

    This is what I gathered from Twitter quotes from tarek khatib.
     
    Jul 20, 2012
    20,044
    He said that he's targeting a younger player for the midfield This excludes TQ.

    He also said 'money isn't a problem if it's an investment for the future'

    This is what I gathered from Twitter quotes from tarek khatib.
    Yea that second quote let me see if i can find the italian version

    - - - Updated - - -

    This guy
     

    Xperd

    Allegrophobic Infidel
    Jun 1, 2012
    32,478
    Pastore is the better player.. he can give you this moments of genius. create something out of nothing.
    No way man.

    Mata is a world class AM.Ruined by Mou unfortunately

    Consistently producing great numbers at Chelsea.

    Pastore on the other hand is a very inconsistent player.Mata is more of a sure thing.

    He would be top draw for us if he give him all the offensive freedom he needs
     

    Osman

    Koul Khara!
    Aug 30, 2002
    59,288
    No way man.

    Mata is a world class AM.Ruined by Mou unfortunately

    Consistently producing great numbers at Chelsea.

    Pastore on the other hand is a very inconsistent player.Mata is more of a sure thing.

    He would be top draw for us if he give him all the offensive freedom he needs
    Mata would replace the elements of the influence both Pirlo and Tevez had into our team in one full sweep if he got him. Pirlo's long passing vision and ability to find deep runs, and Tevez ability to allways demand the ball and be a talisman that get things moving in possession, short-passing game thats high standard. Certainly cant for ask for more then him, outside the Isco's etc.
     

    HAZEM

    L'architetto
    Apr 22, 2008
    8,215
    No way man.

    Mata is a world class AM.Ruined by Mou unfortunately

    Consistently producing great numbers at Chelsea.

    Pastore on the other hand is a very inconsistent player.Mata is more of a sure thing.

    He would be top draw for us if he give him all the offensive freedom he needs
    i just can't ignore the moments of awe that Pastore creates. am with you that Mata is more consistent. but as i said before, am biased :D
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 16)