[Serie A] JUVENTUS - Palermo (September 23rd 2010) (16 Viewers)

[RAMI-N]

THEY don't want that. I mean the invisible people.

Especially how we suck the odds should be like what you said if not even 4 goals for the opposition.

Hey, I didn't make this event... enough with your invisible comments, please.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[RAMI-N]

I think so too. Always done it the way you just mentioned it when I was a bookie.

But credits should be given to our bookies for their work, Wahdy, Chest, Rami and Dru.

Rab, I started to put 3-2 results out since you mentioned this suggestion.

 

[Azzurri7]

Rab, I started to put 3-2 results out since you mentioned this suggestion.

I know bro. That's why I mentioned this here and not in previous ones.

 

[RAMI-N]

I know bro. That's why I mentioned this here and not in previous ones.

int: to Uncle Rab

 

[X Æ A-12]

I'm broke already :depressed

 

[Mark]

Hey, I didn't make this event... enough with your invisible comments, please.

oh! You made those invisible bets?


:cap:

 

[Gabriel]

All in on Joovae!

Wise choice.

 

[Yamen]

It's other result option that destroyed vCash competition.

here we go again

 

[X Æ A-12]

Wise choice.

Suck my dickie dick dick.

 

[chester]

I agree with Dule here, the other result option can only be high enough if the 3-1, 3-2, 4-0 and 4-1 results for home and away victory are included.

Dru and Wahdan,

Can you guys take this into account, a 50/1 or higher should only be allowed for other results if there are more results to bet on then there were at this event.

.

 

[Albertmare]

I'm broke

 

[V]

I agree with Dule here, the other result option can only be high enough if the 3-1, 3-2, 4-0 and 4-1 results for home and away victory are included.

Dru and Wahdan,

Can you guys take this into account, a 50/1 or higher should only be allowed for other results if there are more results to bet on then there were at this event.

.

Ridiculous. An odd of 70?

 

[Klin]

Badfish and Albert.

 

[chester]

Ridiculous. An odd of 70?

An odd of 70 is rediculous when there are so many options left yes.

 

[RAMI-N]

oh! You made those invisible bets?


:cap:

You made them too, and many others did it. What's wrong in that?
You also once said it was a strategy that you made private bets

But you were talking about how 3-2 should be taken out of the "other results" and alleged people who were setting these events and making private bets of refusing to take the 3-2 out!

 

[RAMI-N]

An odd of 70 is rediculous when there are so many options left yes.

It depends on the game, Ches. some games bookies give like 46.00 odds for 3-2, so then you can include it in the other results and lower the odds of it.

 

[Azzurri7]

There's nothing wrong with betting private IMO.

 

[chester]

It depends on the game, Ches. some games bookies give like 46.00 odds for 3-2, so then you can include it in the other results and lower the odds of it.

True, if you lower the odds, I agree, but like I said, odds of 70 or so are rediculous when, like in your example, 3-2 isn't a seperate result to bet on if the odds for 3-2 are 46.

In fact, we should only use the other result option for, f.e. bets with only odds higher then the value we are giving for the other result option.

f.e.:

We give an odd of 60/1 for other result, then we may only include results that have odds equal or higher then the 60/1, all results with option lower then 60/1 should be added to the possible match results.

 

[RAMI-N]

True, if you lower the odds, I agree, but like I said, odds of 70 or so are rediculous when, like in your example, 3-2 isn't a seperate result to bet on if the odds for 3-2 are 46.

In fact, we should only use the other result option for, f.e. bets with only odds higher then the value we are giving for the other result option.

f.e.:

We give an odd of 60/1 for other result, then we may only include results that have odds equal or higher then the 60/1, all results with option lower then 60/1 should be added to the possible match results.

I agree... We need flexibility here...
you can have a look at our next game event and give me your opinion int:

 

[chester]

Well done, that is how it should be from now on.