[Serie A] Juventus 2-2 Salernitana [September 11th, 2022] (11 Viewers)

vote


  • Total voters
    21
  • Poll closed .
Aug 2, 2005
4,422
For fuck sake..

Bonnuci even tried to touch the ball after it is passing him..
GK had not chance of getting to the ball either and Bonbon was not in his view line..
That was a scandalous decision.



Back to Master Allegri..
Dont ever think to put Kean on the bench ever again..
Stupid tactics and gameplan as always.


We have a very good squad even with the injuries to put up such performancessssss
Since this is becoming our habbit


They dominated us the first half, created shit.
Second half even if we put an effort.. but still cannot crack any nut whatever it is

Fluke penal out of nowhere for a rush moment does not save face
Goal stolen does not get Master Allegri for this yet




And before the game I was like... ok.. this is the game that we will show some improvement

But it turns to be still a shitment





Sent from my SM-N986B using Tapatalk
 

icemaη

Rab's Husband - The Regista
Moderator
Aug 27, 2008
36,369
Yeah he does. If he doesn't touch it I don't think that it is offside.
In England I saw the exact same play with the goal given a couple of weeks ago.
I, personally thought that he touched it. A slowmo would help.
It's right there on the FAs website
"interfering with an opponent” means preventing an opponent from
playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s
line of vision or challenging an opponent for the ball
 

abstract

Senior Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,940
Yeah he does. If he doesn't touch it I don't think that it is offside.
In England I saw the exact same play with the goal given a couple of weeks ago.
I, personally thought that he touched it. A slowmo would help.
If you go for the ball in the goal area you're in offside even if you don't touch the ball.
 

Bianconero_Aus

Beppe Marotta Is My God
May 26, 2009
81,130
Bonucci didn’t come close to touching the ball or interfering with Sepe’s line of sight. The only argument is he made a play for the ball, but even still, the keeper had no chance of saving it regardless.

Disgusting decision but extremely typical that this league and these refs find any way they can to either award penalties against us or disallow our goals. It’s happened more and more every season.

We suck though. This whole club is a mess and it’s going to be another season suffering to make the top 4 again. Nothing else to add.
 

icemaη

Rab's Husband - The Regista
Moderator
Aug 27, 2008
36,369
Bonucci didn’t come close to touching the ball or interfering with Sepe’s line of sight. The only argument is he made a play for the ball, but even still, the keeper had no chance of saving it regardless.

Disgusting decision but extremely typical that this league and these refs find any way they can to either award penalties against us or disallow our goals. It’s happened more and more every season.

We suck though. This whole club is a mess and it’s going to be another season suffering to make the top 4 again. Nothing else to add.
Agreed and agreed
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,177
Sigh all you want. That team could easily have just disappeared and not got close to "winning" the game. After the first half that was something as it was so bad we didn't look like having a shot.
We have seen this before, even this past week. So what? How many times do we have to be fooled by this response?
 

juve123

Senior Member
Aug 10, 2017
16,652
So legit goal if he doesn't touch it?
Or
Bonucci interfering with the play by making the player who was shirt tugging him unable to play the ball?

As I see it if he doesn't give the goal he must give the penalty, granted he doesn't touch it.

Either way terrible referring.
I am sure he must have said that bonucci was interfering with the play.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 10)