[Serie A] Empoli vs. Juventus (33 Viewers)

[giovanotti]

++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


And after benching the whole team, when do you let them play again?

He didn't mean the whole team,he meant the key guys if they don't perform well.If you are a coach and have a need to sub all the team,you better hang yourself ,in that case.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[JCK]

++ [ originally posted by giovanotti ] ++

He didn't mean the whole team,he meant the key guys if they don't perform well.If you are a coach and have a need to sub all the team,you better hang yourself ,in that case.

Come again?

 

[giovanotti]

++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


Since you are relying to examples, let me give you an example.

Last season in December tha game against Milan in Delle Alpi. Let us all be honest and reasonable, Cannavaro and Buffon were the only ones that played well. The next game you want 9 out of the starting 11 to be benched? That does not make sense Rab, check your theory again.

Zambrotta,also, had a good game ,and the whole thing was part of the tactics,Capello wanted a defensive way of playing and we defended ourselves at the time.

 

[JCK]

++ [ originally posted by giovanotti ] ++

Zambrotta,also, had a good game ,and the whole thing was part of the tactics,Capello wanted a defensive way of playing and we defended ourselves at the time.

Irrelevant to the discussion.

 

[giovanotti]

++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


Come again?

Read your post and my answer to it again!

 

[JCK]

++ [ originally posted by giovanotti ] ++

Read your post and my answer to it again!

You don't make sense, that's the whole point of asking to explain.

 

[giovanotti]

++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


Irrelevant to the discussion.

You said that the whole team(barring Cannavaro and Buffon) was bad,and I said that it was the part of Capello's tactics to defend all the time.It is obvious if you want to save a goal from the strongest team,at the particualar moment,you need to defend and your team won't be dangerous,and the players won't be what you used to watch.

 

[JCK]

++ [ originally posted by giovanotti ] ++

You said that the whole team(barring Cannavaro and Buffon) was bad,and I said that it was the part of Capello's tactics to defend all the time.It is obvious if you want to save a goal from the strongest team,at the particualar moment,you need to defend and your team won't be dangerous,and the players won't be what you used to watch.

Still it is irrelevant to the discussion. I agree with all what you wrote and I know why Capello chose this tactic, that was not the point I was trying to make however.

 

[giovanotti]

++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


You really have a problem, I was talking about Trezeguet and yet you managed to squeeze Del Piero in there. It seems you need simpler English or I should highlight the player I am talking about so you can see properly.

Sarcasm all the way!

 

[JCK]

++ [ originally posted by giovanotti ] ++

Sarcasm all the way!

Do you have a problem with it?

 

[giovanotti]

++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


Still it is irrelevant to the discussion. I agree with all what you wrote and I know why Capello chose this tactic, that was not the point I was trying to make however.

So you explained a wrong exaple for the topic.
Azzurri said if someone perform bad,just sub him and give a chance to some other,and you started with the game against Milan,which is,irrelevant or not,totally wrong example.

 

[JCK]

++ [ originally posted by giovanotti ] ++

So you explained a wrong exaple for the topic.
Azzurri said if someone perform bad,just sub him and give a chance to some other,and you started with the game against Milan,which is,irrelevant or not,totally wrong example.

Still we were not talking about substitution we were talking about changing the player from one game to another. This is another example on how you jump into conclusions without even knowing what others are talking about.

 

[giovanotti]

++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


Do you have a problem with it?

Honestly,I think that it is much more your problem than mine.

 

[JCK]

++ [ originally posted by giovanotti ] ++

Honestly,I think that it is much more your problem than mine.

It is not a problem for me. Again you consider yourself knowledgeable about me more than myself.

 

[giovanotti]

++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


Still we were not talking about substitution we were talking about changing the player from one game to another. This is another example on how you jump into conclusions without even knowing what others are talking about.

Check again what you said.Jeeks my man,you start to forget things.

http://www.juventuz.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=12277&postid=811182#post811182

I said ,we were not bad at the time,we just defended than!You didn't have a need to consider changing 9 players from one game to another...if we really had a need to change our first 9 players that would be a disaster.
So you picked a wrong example,that's the point.

 

[giovanotti]

++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


It is not a problem for me. Again you consider yourself knowledgeable about me more than myself.

It is a problem for you because that way of communication won't bring you a good.

 

[JCK]

++ [ originally posted by giovanotti ] ++

Check again what you said.Jeeks my man,you start to forget things.

http://www.juventuz.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=12277&postid=811182#post811182

I said ,we were not bad at the time,we just defended than!You didn't have a need to consider changing 9 players from one game to another...if we really had a need to change our first 9 players that would be a disaster.
So you picked a wrong example,that's the point.

I did not mentions substitutions, go read my post and tell me where I mentioned substitutions so I won't hang myslef as you already said.

I chose the wrong example, so what?? It is an example. Consider it a ficticious game where only two players perfomed, the point was changing 9 out of 11 for the next coming game. Did you understand it now? I don't think so, you will say it is a bad example, then say something about me and Del Piero then say that you know something about me more than I do.

You are actually like a broken disk, I'd rather take Seven's advice as of now.

 

[JCK]

++ [ originally posted by giovanotti ] ++

It is a problem for you because that way of communication won't bring you a good.

Again how do you know? Do you know what is it bringing me or not?

Then again, if I am to clarify something for you, I can tell you that there are many others who enjoy it, it is just you who is being edgy about it.

 

[giovanotti]

++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


Again how do you know? Do you know what is it bringing me or not?

Then again, if I am to clarify something for you, I can tell you that there are many others who enjoy it , it is just you who is being edgy about it.

Let me say it in your own language: you consider yourself knowledgeable about others more than theirselves.

 

[Shoryuken]

"You can say many things about Del Piero but you can't attack his professionalism."

Disagree, after the season was over Del Piero went on interview and said that Fabio Capello wasnt a great coach and that Fabio had very little to do with the scudetto win, he also complained about him being subed so much, Thats hardly professional.