the idea of a 10 min removal of a player is appealing though
how do you decide what's a cynical foul or where are the boundaries of dissent?
as brny wrote, they still can't consistently judge handball or offside which are supposed to be objective. if you add an other subjective element that would only bring chaos and unpredictability
this is the definition of dissent by the rulebook:
A player who is guilty of dissent by protesting (verbally or non-verbally) against a referee’s decision must be cautioned.
The captain of a team has no special status or privileges under the Laws of the Game but he has a degree of responsibility for the behaviour of his team.
it was a yellow worthy foul so far, yet fuckers like barella got regularly away with telling the ref to fuck off, or lautaro could throw the ball at the ref and get nothing