Sequels that are better than original movie (1 Viewer)

[Marc]

Do your thang...

Poslano sa mog SM-J530F koristeći Tapatalk

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[kappa96]

the godfather part 2
lord of the rings the two towers
the dark knight
empire strikes back
spider-man 2
terminator 2
dawn of the planet of the apes
captain america the winter soldier

 

[Turk_Bianconero]

mad max 2

 

[Cerval]

the godfather part 2
lord of the rings the two towers
the dark knight
empire strikes back
spider-man 2
terminator 2
dawn of the planet of the apes
captain america the winter soldier

The two towers is not better than the fellowship for me

 

[campionesidd]

the godfather part 2
lord of the rings the two towers
the dark knight
empire strikes back
spider-man 2
terminator 2
dawn of the planet of the apes
captain america the winter soldier

Disagree
Disagree
Agree, but I personally prefer Batman Begins
Agree
Agree
Haven't seen
Agree

- - - Updated - - -

The two towers is not better than the fellowship for me

Fellowship > Two Towers > ROTK for me.
Although all three movies are excellent.

 

[zizinho]

Marc banned - with each sequel it gets better

 

[kappa96]

The two towers is not better than the fellowship for me

Disagree
Disagree
Agree, but I personally prefer Batman Begins
Agree
Agree
Haven't seen
Agree

- - - Updated - - -



Fellowship > Two Towers > ROTK for me.
Although all three movies are excellent.

In the end it comes down as a personal preference. In case of lotr trilogy I would put it backwards rotk>two towers>fellowship
There is not much between them, as I consider it the greatest trilogy of all time.

 

[JuveJay]

Is TT really a sequel when it is part of a trilogy? The three are essentially one movie cut into three.

I suppose by definition it is, but not in the traditional sense of a sequel.

 

[kappa96]

@JuveJay
We could consider lotr a movie in 3 parts ,but if the first doesn't perform financially we would've had a standalone movie.
Also I like many didn't know it was a book adaption at the time of release.

 

[JuveJay]

@JuveJay
We could consider lotr a movie in 3 parts ,but if the first doesn't perform financially we would've had a standalone movie.
Also I like many didn't know it was a book adaption at the time of release.

I'm not sure about that. It was shot continuously for over a year so the three would have been released regardless, as they cost hundreds of millions of dollars to make.

I imagine that contractually they would also not have been allowed to only release the Fellowship, it would have made a mockery of the Tolkien estate and New Line Cinema.