What interests? It's clearly not in the club's interests to have him, otherwise he would be playing. Why are you so stubborn and delusional regarding this matter? Aren't you able to look at it from a more logical standpoint than getting all emotional over the "club's interests?"
The guy is not playing, even when others are injured; hence, it's not in the club's interests to keep him. He is rotting away on the bench, and we are paying him to do so. To utilize you own logic against you, isn't it in the club's interests to offload a player who gets paid not to play?
The guy is not playing, even when others are injured; hence, it's not in the club's interests to keep him. He is rotting away on the bench, and we are paying him to do so. To utilize you own logic against you, isn't it in the club's interests to offload a player who gets paid not to play?
The club has had sub standard coaches that utilize the wrong tactics & personnel.So what happens when we get rid of Giovinco, we use Grosso as a winger? De Ceglie as his replacement?
I'd like him to shine because 1. He obviously has the talent. 2. It would be cheaper than wasting money on another player. 3. He provides width,creativity & speed,something this team clearly lacks & he should leave because he's being paid for nothing.
What about Poulsen? Does he not earn more than Giovinco? I don't see you bitching about De Ceglie,why is that exactly?
