Ramirez or Giovinco (6 Viewers)

Giovinco or Ramirez?

  • Giovinco

  • Ramirez


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Nzoric

Grazie Mirko
Jan 16, 2011
37,868
#2
Ramirez.

I think that he's about as good as Giovinco is now, despite the 3 year difference in age. He's got much more potential in my book and will only be a bit more expensive.

oh and, FUCK giovinco
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
#3
Dunno. I think Giovinco because he'll never ever leave Juventus. If Ramirez gets better he'll want a one way ticket to ManShitty, Madrid and the likes.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
#5
I would take Ramirez. Hands down, and that is no offence to Gio.

I think Ramirez is a better all around player than Gio.
 
OP
Nicholas

Nicholas

MIRKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jan 30, 2008
38,737
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #6
    I knew this thread would attract you Serg, I know you were very involved in his thread last summer when we were heavily linked :D
     

    KB824

    Senior Member
    Sep 16, 2003
    31,789
    #8
    I knew this thread would attract you Serg, I know you were very involved in his thread last summer when we were heavily linked :D
    You got me hook, line, and sinker on this one. And you knew you would.


    Ramirez has a good combination of strength and technical finesse as well. He can run over you, or dribble around you, and makes it seem very easy. People don't realize that he is deceptively strong.

    But yes, I have not hidden my admiration for the young man.
     

    Suns

    Release clause?
    May 22, 2009
    22,084
    #9
    YAY, yet another thread where we can throw shit on Giovinco.

    And stop comparing Giovinco to guys we don't own. We already own 50% of Giovinco's contract so he's a completely different story.
     

    KB824

    Senior Member
    Sep 16, 2003
    31,789
    #11
    YAY, yet another thread where we can throw shit on Giovinco.

    And stop comparing Giovinco to guys we don't own. We already own 50% of Giovinco's contract so he's a completely different story.
    Who's throwing shit on Giovinco?


    Personally, I would rather have Ramirez. Ideally, I would like to have both
     

    Raz

    Senior Member
    Nov 20, 2005
    12,218
    #12
    YAY, yet another thread where we can throw shit on Giovinco.

    And stop comparing Giovinco to guys we don't own. We already own 50% of Giovinco's contract so he's a completely different story.
    Why can't we compare?

    Of course Ramirez, one is tested and failed, the other might still succeed.
     
    OP
    Nicholas

    Nicholas

    MIRKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Jan 30, 2008
    38,737
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #13
    YAY, yet another thread where we can throw shit on Giovinco.

    And stop comparing Giovinco to guys we don't own. We already own 50% of Giovinco's contract so he's a completely different story.
    I don't believe it's throwing shit on anybody, it's a comparison about two players who could potentially be joining us.
     
    Dec 31, 2008
    22,910
    #14
    Ramirez.
    Giovinco should be discarded at some disgusting club's doorstep(Preferably Fiorentina, Napoli, Palermo, Genoa, Roma)
     

    Suns

    Release clause?
    May 22, 2009
    22,084
    #16
    Who's throwing shit on Giovinco?


    Personally, I would rather have Ramirez. Ideally, I would like to have both
    I don't believe it's throwing shit on anybody, it's a comparison about two players who could potentially be joining us.
    Not talking about you guys, just the regular trolls on the Giovinco thread.
    Why can't we compare?

    Of course Ramirez, one is tested and failed, the other might still succeed.
    Why we can't compare? Because we already own Giovinco and he'd be much easier to get back. Also there will be less money involved.

    And Giovinco never failed when he was here. Thats just an unfair.
     

    Raz

    Senior Member
    Nov 20, 2005
    12,218
    #17
    No he didn't he really blossomed. The expectations were quite high enough for him and he easily achieved them.

    Now we had motta, amauri and all that kind and they were 100% not 50 ours, but we somehow were able to compare, so I don't see a problem comparing Gio too.
     
    OP
    Nicholas

    Nicholas

    MIRKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Jan 30, 2008
    38,737
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #18
    Suns,

    The problem is, Giovinco will be the key to negotiations on coming back here, if he doesn't want to, we're abit stuck.
     

    JuveJay

    Senior Signor
    Moderator
    Mar 6, 2007
    74,882
    #19
    YAY, yet another thread where we can throw shit on Giovinco.

    And stop comparing Giovinco to guys we don't own. We already own 50% of Giovinco's contract so he's a completely different story.
    At least you took this well :D

    People compare Giovinco to Pepe, even though they play a different team role. People also talk about Giovinco when he is not available for selection.

    Ramirez and Giovinco is a good comparison, because they have a similar role and both players would have to be bought in the summer. If we don't make a move for Giovinco he is still a Parma player, so we own neither. This is the choice, different factors involved. Can you choose or will you say both?
     

    Suns

    Release clause?
    May 22, 2009
    22,084
    #20
    No he didn't he really blossomed. The expectations were quite high enough for him and he easily achieved them.

    Now we had motta, amauri and all that kind and they were 100% not 50 ours, but we somehow were able to compare, so I don't see a problem comparing Gio too.
    In order to blossom you have to get some game time now and then.

    To get Giovinco, we' have to pay around 8 million. But in order to get Ramirez, we'd have to pay close to 20 million depending on if there are other teams interested or not.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)