Rafinha (5 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
zizoufan

zizoufan

Z.Z T h e M a s t e r
#401
May 25, 2004
2,500
#401
being an injury prone does'nt mean u suck. Am I wrong ? who know maybe he'll regain his full fitness this year. Personnaly, I like how zebina play, he's not dani alves for sure but he's courageous and has plenty of ideas. I suggest you should judge a player from valid criteria.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
JuveJay

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
#403
Mar 6, 2007
74,903
#403
Suns said:
I would rather have Rafinha than Grosso. I think we should give De Ceglie the chance to prove himself. Let's see how this guy can perform and if he is crap then we should sign a new LB in January. I would rather give De Ceglie 6 months to prove himself than playing Grygera or Zebina cuz we already now they suck.
Click to expand...
No, the left side is weaker. Zebina and Caceres, with Grygera if needed. Or Molinaro and De Ceglie. Grosso is needed more.
 

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
#407
Dec 19, 2003
97,627
#407
oh so now Mediaset are reporting Secco's comments on Rafinha. Bad boys! Fire that guy who wrote that article yesterday.
 
Sad Statue

Sad Statue

wannabe Bart Simpson
#416
Mar 28, 2006
1,906
#416
JuveJay said:
No, the left side is weaker. Zebina and Caceres, with Grygera if needed. Or Molinaro and De Ceglie. Grosso is needed more.
Click to expand...
caceres can play as a DC and DL. i don't understand why people think that he can play as a RB. in Uruguay he plays as a LB well. So there we have De Ceglie who is a gamble and Caceres and Molinaro who at least is fit. We are weaker at the RB position. We have a very good player who is mainly injured. We can't depend on Zebina...
 
Vinman

Vinman

2013 Prediction Cup Champ
#417
Jul 16, 2002
11,482
#417
RavaneVialli said:
http://www.tuttosport.com/calcio/ca.../Secco+smentisce:+«Rafinha?+Non+ci+interessa»

Secco: We're not interested in Rafinha. We're covered at the moment at that department and there's no room for him.
Click to expand...
yeah, were really covered there, idiot :sergio:

JCK said:
I told you so from the beginning, SUCKO is not able to pull such a deal.

FUCKO SUCKO
Click to expand...
JCK said:
What??? He overpaid for Melo and caused the club to loose millions. This guy can't even sell, he can only sell for 2.5 M€

FUCKO SUCKO
Click to expand...
now you're making sense, Jack :agree: :beer:
 
RavaneVialli

RavaneVialli

Senior Member
#418
Jan 27, 2008
863
#418
Sad Statue said:
caceres can play as a DC and DL. i don't understand why people think that he can play as a RB. in Uruguay he plays as a LB well. So there we have De Ceglie who is a gamble and Caceres and Molinaro who at least is fit. We are weaker at the RB position. We have a very good player who is mainly injured. We can't depend on Zebina...
Click to expand...
While our first choice midfield should be Sissoko-Melo-Camoranesi, we need a more offensive left-back to provide width there, while on the right we need a more defensive-minded one to cover Camoranesi. That's why Ferrara is trying Caceres on the right, I think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)