Radja Nainggolan - CM - Cagliari/Roma (44 Viewers)

[Trequartista]

This guy is pretty good but anything over 12M is overpaying.

I hope we won't give Marrone.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[ALC]

No fucking way, Marrone better stay, at least he's getting significant game time unlike Sorensen.

 

[Nicholas]

There we had anticipated in very difficult times, when many of Guarin said that Martin Caceres was shot outside the Community of the Old Lady in the January market. Well, after positioning the rear with the strong and versatile Uruguayan defender, now Marotta is ready to close the big hit for the median winter. The reinforcement for the midfield of Antonio Conte will Radja Nainggolan from Cagliari. The deal goes through to 10m euros more than half of the tag Ekdal and Brown and Ciro Immobile loan for next season. With two shots so the Juventus management certifies further their ambitions of wanting to sew the flag on his chest.


THE TV WATCH FOR TUTTOJUVE

Google translate.

 

[Alen]

10m cash + half of Ekdal + loaning Marrone and Immobile to Cagliari next season? Is that what it says?

 

[Fint]

So Nainggolan and Caceres will be our two signings then?

 

[Nicholas]

Yes Alen.

Marrone will stay with us but then go to Cagliari in June.

 

[Nicholas]

Perhaps because we've got a deal with Guarin for June aswell?

Guarin,Naingollan,Marchisio,Pirlo,Vidal



Ok I'll stop dreaming.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Is Guarin fap-worthy?

 

[ALC]

10m cash + half of Ekdal + loaning Marrone and Immobile to Cagliari next season? Is that what it says?

I wouldn't do it then. He's not worth that at all.

 

[Joe]

I want Marrone to stay with us.

10M + 2nd half of Ekdal + Immobile on loan sounds more than reasonable to me. Marrone would be nice depth.

Marchisio, Vidal, Pirlo, Nainggolan, Marrone, maybe Guarin.

 

[ALC]

We're losing too many players if we loan all of Marrone, Immobile and sell Ekdal. We should definitely keep Marrone, looks at teams like Barca and United, they're not loaning Thiago and the twins away are they? That would be fucking stupid.

 

[Alen]

I wouldn't do it then. He's not worth that at all.

It's basically 10m + half of Ekdal.

Marrone and Immobile will be loaned next year with or without this transfer.

 

[ALC]

Why would Marrone get loaned out? He's shown so much promise and fits in the team like a glove. I would be pushing for us to buy him if I saw him in another team ffs.

 

[Hust]

I don't think he will be loaned. He paid his dues already on loan to Siena. He has performed well half way through the season and we still have half of a season for him to make these kinds of appearances.

No reason or need to loan Marrone anymore. There are other CM's that need to be shown the exit.

 

[Alen]

Why would Marrone get loaned out? He's shown so much promise and fits in the team like a glove. I would be pushing for us to buy him if I saw him in another team ffs.

He'll be loaned because he's showing really great signs to be just a 6th choice player. We'll probably get someone to replace Pirlo and that will push Marrone further back in the pecking order.
If it's a simple loan, then it will show that we have plans for him. We usually co-own those we aren't particularly interested in. In 2007 we loaned Marchisio and Giovinco because at the time we thought they are quality.
And unlike the popular opinion in this forum, I believe that for Marrone and Juve will be more useful to be a starter for Cagliari then get 90 minutes total playing time for Juve throughout the season. This year he got playing time only because we decided to sell Pazienza and buy another CM. That made Marrone first choice CM on the bench. If he stays he'll most probably be 3rd choice from the bench and spend the entire season in the stands.

 

[Hust]

He'll be loaned because he's showing really great signs to be a 6th choice player. We'll probably get someone to replace Pirlo and that will push Marrone further back in the pecking order.
If it's a simple loan, then it will show that we have plans for him. We usually co-own those we aren't particularly interested in. In 2007 we loaned Marchisio and Giovinco because at the time we thought they are quality.
And unlike the popular opinion in this forum, I believe that for Marrone and Juve will be more useful to be a starter for Cagliari then get 90 minutes total playing time for Juve throughout the season. This year he got playing time only because we decided to sell Pazienza and buy another CM. That made Marrone first choice CM on the bench. If he stays he'll most probably be 3rd choice from the bench and spend the entire season in the stands.

Vidal(Radja)-Pirlo(Marrone)-Marchisio

What would be so bad about that?

Plus Giach slots in nicely too sometimes.

 

[Fake Melo]

With Conte in charge, I think Marrone has a future here.

 

[ALC]

I wonder why we can't just use Marrone to replace Pirlo. He's not that young. It would be nice if Conte didn't share the same opinion all of Italy seems to share with regards to youth.

 

[Alen]

Vidal(Radja)-Pirlo(Marrone)-Marchisio

What would be so bad about that?

That would be fine.

I think though that we plan to buy someone who will act strictly as a Pirlo replacement. That's why Marrone will be loaned.

And another thing, unrelated to this, I think that we will have a disappointing summer mercato. Don't expect much guys.

 

[Salvatore]

Marrone would go out on loan if Marotta was in charge of transfers, sure.