That is an incredibly reductionist way of thinking about those situations. You wish a sheik owned the club, and just threw money at every little issue, don't you? Even though that behaviour is is basically ruining competitive football, ensuring that the same few clubs are always at the top?
Money is a condition in all professional contracts. I could break down the reasons other than money that all 3 of those players left, but I'll save everyone that minutiae.
Is Zlatan still at PSG? I guess they must not have wanted him to stay at the club. There can't be any reasons why players want to move other than money. Like playing time, sentimental attachments, a new challenge, more attractive leagues (often subjective perspective), countries with more attractive lifestyles (subjective), personal internal issues at the club, etc.
Yes, our management decides how money should be spent to best serve the club, given REALITY. We have a wage bill that is 10th highest in world football, the club isn't poor. We have a wage structure that is meant to ensure the club remains financially healthy, and competitive.
This team wasn't forced to buy Higuain for 90M, Berna for 40M and Costa for 46M, or give Higgy 7.5M net, Dybala 7M net, and Costa 6M net. An argument can be made that a lot of that money could (should) have been spent in other ways.
Also, can we all just take a moment to say 'Thank FUCK we didn't give Leo Bonucci that salary'?
There is no explicit 'rule' that we have to sell one star player per offseason. People can say that because there has been some turnover (there always will be in pro sports), and it fits an argument they want to make, but there's nothing definitive stating that's part of Juve's business model. Beppe, Fabio, Pavel, and Agnelli basically confer, and then do what they think is best. They've been doing a phenomenal job.
The one explicitly stated maxim that Beppe and Co. live by is that if a player doesn't want to be at the club -- for whatever reason -- then they can go elsewhere.
Ah, my bad then, buddy. I was more so referring to that one line that Baus had, about the business model being that we needed to sell one star player a year. The one constant is that if players want to leave, for whatever reason, they can. I think management basically just does what they think is best, and while money looks like the obvious defining factor, that's not necessarily so. There are circumstances specific to each incident, and ultimately management will analyze the pros and cons and then do what they think is in the best interests of the club, given the full picture.
You and I do agree on most, Husti.