Paolo De Ceglie (72 Viewers)
- Thread starter djleli
- Start date
And not only me, this is a typical Osman reaction against solid argumentation.
Osman, chill and take it easy, you dont have to go on personal level.
I ve told you that in the past...
I ll "rewind the tape", not because of you, i know that you are an intelligent member, we have spoken in the past, you know my reason, you could easily understand what i was trying to say, even if i had to use half of this text.
Again, do not take it personally, this is a public forum after all, at any moment a new member might pop up and get involved in this debate.
If i dont mention some of my arguments, he might mention them, or he might start a counterargument who doesnt include them, forcing me to repeat them
and make the discussion to run in endless circles. I am not writing a long text because i hate you.
(i only hate Molinaro:sick: ) I am writing it, because i have the patience and out of respect, of the rest of the ppl who have the patience and the respect to involve themselves actively in this discussion, after all they do have the right, to do so, this is not a private party.
Stop taking everything personally!
Here we go again in a Molinaro issue
Well, i ll repeat again, some of the arguments i ve already posted about this certain view:
-Molinaro had much more playing time than any of them and he had much more time to prove his "worth".
-Molinaro had no competition about this position and he had a practical and mental advantage
-Molinaro was used at the only place on the field, at the exact position on the field, he is meant to be,
whilst the rest were used in other places and couldnt make a proper use of their best attributes
-Molinaro had no competition and no matter how much he sucked we were forced to play him again and again, his particular position on the field is considered less important and CR could tolerate him but he couldnt tolerate the others in more vital positions.
-Some players, like Tiago should force CR to change his entire gameplan to fit him in. Tiago is a CM and there was no place in our team for that.
CR made the tactical choice to use 2 DMs to support our defense and that exclude Tiago's role in our team from the start.
As far as i am concerned and every and each of them failed to grasp their chances, but some of them had extremely limited chances, if they had more, or if our coach was creating the right conditions for them to work properly, they mad have done better. We cant tell that. But we can surely tell that Molinaro cant do any better than that, he had the ideal conditions and was still mediocre,
we are certain that he cant do any better than that, thats Molinaro and thats all he can do. If we cannot tolerate such incompetence why are we keeping him???
Osman, chill and take it easy, you dont have to go on personal level.
I ve told you that in the past...
I ll "rewind the tape", not because of you, i know that you are an intelligent member, we have spoken in the past, you know my reason, you could easily understand what i was trying to say, even if i had to use half of this text.
Again, do not take it personally, this is a public forum after all, at any moment a new member might pop up and get involved in this debate.
If i dont mention some of my arguments, he might mention them, or he might start a counterargument who doesnt include them, forcing me to repeat them
and make the discussion to run in endless circles. I am not writing a long text because i hate you.
(i only hate Molinaro:sick: ) I am writing it, because i have the patience and out of respect, of the rest of the ppl who have the patience and the respect to involve themselves actively in this discussion, after all they do have the right, to do so, this is not a private party.
Stop taking everything personally!
Here we go again in a Molinaro issue
Well, i ll repeat again, some of the arguments i ve already posted about this certain view:
-Molinaro had much more playing time than any of them and he had much more time to prove his "worth".
-Molinaro had no competition about this position and he had a practical and mental advantage
-Molinaro was used at the only place on the field, at the exact position on the field, he is meant to be,
whilst the rest were used in other places and couldnt make a proper use of their best attributes
-Molinaro had no competition and no matter how much he sucked we were forced to play him again and again, his particular position on the field is considered less important and CR could tolerate him but he couldnt tolerate the others in more vital positions.
-Some players, like Tiago should force CR to change his entire gameplan to fit him in. Tiago is a CM and there was no place in our team for that.
CR made the tactical choice to use 2 DMs to support our defense and that exclude Tiago's role in our team from the start.
As far as i am concerned and every and each of them failed to grasp their chances, but some of them had extremely limited chances, if they had more, or if our coach was creating the right conditions for them to work properly, they mad have done better. We cant tell that. But we can surely tell that Molinaro cant do any better than that, he had the ideal conditions and was still mediocre,
we are certain that he cant do any better than that, thats Molinaro and thats all he can do. If we cannot tolerate such incompetence why are we keeping him???
To be honest, I feel the only person who was really hard done by the lack of regular playtime last season was Tiago. You would wanna believe he has better chances of improving per game than all the above mentioned especially Criscito. No amount of game time could save that kid. Only buffets at the local restaurant
I think there is a certain reason we didnt permanently sold Criscito and Palladino,
CR knows they didnt have the proper conditions to show their worth,
on the contrary Nocerino had and he was permanently sold.
Nocerino was better than Molinaro as a DM, before we bought Sissoko but still he wasnt good enought to become our permanent solution, i wonder why Molinaro is...
I wonder why CR sees no need to permanently get rid of him and replace him like the rest...
CR knows they didnt have the proper conditions to show their worth,
on the contrary Nocerino had and he was permanently sold.
Nocerino was better than Molinaro as a DM, before we bought Sissoko but still he wasnt good enought to become our permanent solution, i wonder why Molinaro is...
I wonder why CR sees no need to permanently get rid of him and replace him like the rest...
!!
agree, agree 
Just saw one of his crosses in the Olympic game being played right now, there arent just chance hoof balls, or high all the tiem, but varied ones, he pinpoints his target quite well with the crosses (low or high depending on their runs etc).
And all game long, getting the ball or not, he runs endlessly, quite enthusiastic.
And all game long, getting the ball or not, he runs endlessly, quite enthusiastic.
