Not really, because only 5 other drivers have won 28 races or more.
So you're saying that Schumacher would have won the same amount of races and championships if Senna was still alive and racing then?
2003 and 2004 for me were my favourites. FIA can suck my $#@!. and $#@! it, stupid turbo V6 in 2014.

goodbye F1.
How many races did Jenson win in his brawn gp season? i think it was more than alonso has ever won in a single season (donno coz i was not following that year) does that make button a better driver than alonso?
If you want to rank drivers on the basis of their wins then by the time senna died prost had more win than him, does that make prost a better driver than senna?
Even david fucking moping coulthard has won more races than Giles v, does not make him a better driver.
All i am saying is you cannot rate drivers ONLY on the basis of stats (even if u do that schumacher spanks everyone silly)
I dont think senna had many years left in him... maybe 3 more productive years but even in the year of his death the season was already 2 races old where schumi easily owned an ageging senna. Im a huge senna fan but schumi is clearly the greatest ever. You have to go race by race and behind the scenes to find out why schumacher is so special. So if senna was alive the only seasons that he would have given some trouble to michael are 94 and 95 but he looked beat in 94 as well. Michael, after 95, wasted the best years of his life, his entire youth years trying to pull ferrari back up to where they belong. How many drivers tried that in the past? a lot of peeps in the list of the greatest drivers. Look where alonso has been able to take ferrari. Prost failed, Jean failed, mansell failed to name a few.
People give way to credit to today's drivers (alonso to some extent and that turd hamilton) but its just natural when u grow up watching this generation in action.