Osama Bin Laden is dead! (7 Viewers)

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
82,842
Oh I wouldn't mean that if they hadn't been fighting over Kashmir for the past 50 years or so. I don't have anything against Pakistanis here or anywhere else I meet(considering they're not terrorists), but I cannot say a good word about Pakistan especially for what they're doing with Kashmir. I don't care what justification they have. Kashmir is an Indian state. STAY THE FUCK OUT OF IT! :(
Thats word
 

king Ale

Senior Member
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
This is all a bit ridiculous, okay, if he had been killed "ages ago" and not today, why would they wait til now to announce it? Why wouldn't BUSH announce it if it happened before 2008? It would (in alot of Americans opinon) vindicated his War in Afghanistan, and large numbers of Americans don't know he difference between Afghanistan and Iraq, it would vindicate that too.

If it happened after Obama got into office why wait now? I'm sure there was some other news he could of buried beforehand, whats he'd doing? Burying the publicity of him releasing his passport information (lmao at that btw).

This all conspiracy stuff is a bit retarded really, there would never ever be a reason for anyone to actually delay this type of information, Osama had no real power anyway, he was a figurehead nothing more. And so the staged and eloborate fake operation just for the benefit of twitter (when they could of just said thye killed him in some mountain)

Please...
That's what I was wondering. The news about Bin Laden's death could well be just made up but I really can't find any logic in it.

Even if Bin Laden wasn't only a figurehead, his death would still not mean an end to terrorism so I don't think not giving away the news of his death back in 2002 or so would justify the US starting the war.

And they would announce it now because it looks a victory amid all the current problems we have.
Have both parties agreed on announcing such news you mean?
 
OP
Zé Tahir

Zé Tahir

JhoolayLaaaal!
Moderator
Dec 10, 2004
29,281
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #585
    Oh I wouldn't mean that if they hadn't been fighting over Kashmir for the past 50 years or so. I don't have anything against Pakistanis here or anywhere else I meet(considering they're not terrorists), but I cannot say a good word about Pakistan especially for what they're doing with Kashmir. I don't care what justification they have. Kashmir is an Indian state. STAY THE FUCK OUT OF IT! :(
    Kashmir is for Kashmiri's. End of story.

    If you wanna argue history then you'll lose. India has no lawful claim to Kashmir whatsoever. You guys go on living with a chip on your shoulder and annoyance with the existence of Pakistan (1947-cont.)
     

    X Æ A-12

    Senior Member
    Contributor
    Sep 4, 2006
    87,942
    Once again American ignorance and arrogance is laughable. You clearly don't have any idea what you are talking about. Pakistani command forces are as well trained as the navy seals.
    Dude the US spends more money its "defenses" than the rest of the planet combined. When Pakistan starts signing contracts with Lockheed Martin then maybe I'll listen to you.
     

    Osman

    Koul Khara!
    Aug 30, 2002
    61,499
    Dude the US spends more money its "defenses" than the rest of the planet combined. When Pakistan starts signing contracts with Lockheed Martin then maybe I'll listen to you.
    661BN military budget for U (WHYYYYYYYY????), 2nd highest China with 85BN, and France with 67BN.

    Pakistans military gets financial aid from the US, should say enough.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)