Certainly, but in here you're pretty much either a Del Piero basher or a Del Piero lover. The feelings and opinions are too strong.
Buy on AliExpress.com
Okay, whats your dream job? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Nicole
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
Im opting to create a realist view, but its up to the rest of the people to decide whether to catergorise me into ' Bashers' or 'Lovers'.
That was the problem with the ' SHUT UP ' movement, it was a combination of DP lovers and Bashers, no one was actually a realist. When you have someone in the group with a name like David Del Piero, you know that it will not work.
To be honest i prefer the bashers though, simply because they do not contain Azzuri7.
That was the problem with the ' SHUT UP ' movement, it was a combination of DP lovers and Bashers, no one was actually a realist. When you have someone in the group with a name like David Del Piero, you know that it will not work.
To be honest i prefer the bashers though, simply because they do not contain Azzuri7.
Oh that explains all the "SHUT UP" signatures and avatars.
Anycase, you always take a party when you start a conversation. Simply 'cause it's necessary to keep the conversation interesting. I often find myself defending things I don't actually support but I just do it in order to keep the conversation up. Once you have taken a party you can't change it, sort of. I ain't saying you're actually a "Del Piero lover" but there's always arguments against and for any subject really, often it's just a matter of what side you happen to be in when you start the conversation.
Anycase, you always take a party when you start a conversation. Simply 'cause it's necessary to keep the conversation interesting. I often find myself defending things I don't actually support but I just do it in order to keep the conversation up. Once you have taken a party you can't change it, sort of. I ain't saying you're actually a "Del Piero lover" but there's always arguments against and for any subject really, often it's just a matter of what side you happen to be in when you start the conversation.
++ [ originally posted by azzurri7 ] ++
Thats what I like about the Azzurri, he doesn't try to gain any Respect here....
Still it shows the effect Nick Left on you
Thats what I like about the Azzurri, he doesn't try to gain any Respect here
....Still it shows the effect Nick Left on you
Again, you think I'm offended?
TBH, from your picture I knew what you were all about. You're what we Bosnians would call a "papak".
And it's good you're not trying, because it will never happen.
++ [ originally posted by Zambrotta ] ++
Oh that explains all the "SHUT UP" signatures and avatars.
Anycase, you always take a party when you start a conversation. Simply 'cause it's necessary to keep the conversation interesting. I often find myself defending things I don't actually support but I just do it in order to keep the conversation up. Once you have taken a party you can't change it, sort of. I ain't saying you're actually a "Del Piero lover" but there's always arguments against and for any subject really, often it's just a matter of what side you happen to be in when you start the conversation.
Oh that explains all the "SHUT UP" signatures and avatars.
Anycase, you always take a party when you start a conversation. Simply 'cause it's necessary to keep the conversation interesting. I often find myself defending things I don't actually support but I just do it in order to keep the conversation up. Once you have taken a party you can't change it, sort of. I ain't saying you're actually a "Del Piero lover" but there's always arguments against and for any subject really, often it's just a matter of what side you happen to be in when you start the conversation.
yes, in an arguement you can often take 3 stances- For, Against and Neutral. I often find myself going against a point to keep the conversation interesting too. No object alone has no two sides, but it takes a big man to turn his head to both of them. Just for example, Del Piero did play a great match, i adknowledge that but i also know that people are taking this concept way too far, and people are hyping up what Del Piero did as if he was World class or single handedly saved the team. Yes, his bicycle kick was good and his overall play was better, but this doesnt make up for a long shot how poor by his supposedly illustrious standards he has been in the past 5 years.
And btw, Forza Del Piero is not an arguement.
++ [ originally posted by Dan ] ++
Yeah, invented by Don Bes. It was a prime example of how a great idea is corrupted by too many idiots.
yes, in an arguement you can often take 3 stances- For, Against and Neutral. I often find myself going against a point to keep the conversation interesting too. No object alone has no two sides, but it takes a big man to turn his head to both of them. Just for example, Del Piero did play a great match, i adknowledge that but i also know that people are taking this concept way too far, and people are hyping up what Del Piero did as if he was World class or single handedly saved the team. Yes, his bicycle kick was good and his overall play was better, but this doesnt make up for a long shot how poor by his supposedly illustrious standards he has been in the past 5 years.
And btw, Forza Del Piero is not an arguement.
Yeah, invented by Don Bes. It was a prime example of how a great idea is corrupted by too many idiots.
yes, in an arguement you can often take 3 stances- For, Against and Neutral. I often find myself going against a point to keep the conversation interesting too. No object alone has no two sides, but it takes a big man to turn his head to both of them. Just for example, Del Piero did play a great match, i adknowledge that but i also know that people are taking this concept way too far, and people are hyping up what Del Piero did as if he was World class or single handedly saved the team. Yes, his bicycle kick was good and his overall play was better, but this doesnt make up for a long shot how poor by his supposedly illustrious standards he has been in the past 5 years.
And btw, Forza Del Piero is not an arguement.
I don't know where I'm going with this, nevermind.
++ [ originally posted by Zambrotta ] ++
You know there's arguments for the other party but you do not use them in that way. You use them as they fit your side best. You would never say that he showed he still has potential to be our best pplayer although you know that's a possible thought.
I don't know where I'm going with this, nevermind.
You know there's arguments for the other party but you do not use them in that way. You use them as they fit your side best. You would never say that he showed he still has potential to be our best pplayer although you know that's a possible thought.
I don't know where I'm going with this, nevermind.
By the way, I wanted to ask you. Are you a Writer? (as for a living)
I thought you said am not that Important here, so why you keep on replying to my posts?? Listen boy, I don't know who stepped on your Tail and asked ya to stick your nose between me and Dan, IF Dan didn't like that Joke, It's his Problem....
And Yes I do think your offended, Now get a life, don't waste your time with me!
And Yes I do think your offended, Now get a life, don't waste your time with me!
