I'm pretty sure they had something to do with it though... I've heard that the license for using that logo expires at the end of Nike's contract with us... though I don't know much about the topic; can anyone fill us in here?
I hope so... the old one was class, and I still refuse to accept the new crest as our official logo.
Tradition went out the window when we changed our logo. It seems kind of illogical, doesn't it? We use a pink jersey to celebrate our roots, yet throw away the symbol of our club in favour of a "trendy, modern" one :groan:
I know we changed it recently (I think it was 3 times in the last couple of decades), but we didn't completely scrap the whole design and replace it with a new one :irritate:
of course, but I feel that I wear the old logo much more proudly, because I feel that it represents the club more.
It's like changing your country's flag. It doesn't affect your patriotism or values whatsoever, but you'd probably feel a greater sentimental value for the old one, right?
++ [ originally posted by gray ] ++
of course, but I feel that I wear the old logo much more proudly, because I feel that it represents the club more.
It's like changing your country's flag. It doesn't affect your patriotism or values whatsoever, but you'd probably feel a greater sentimental value for the old one, right?