Nicklas Bendtner - ST - Arsenal (4 Viewers)

Who would you rather sign?

  • Bendtner

  • Borriello

  • I...I just can't


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 20, 2012
20,044
For Gazzetta.it, Bendtner is already Juve. Reached an agreement with Arsenal for a transfer on loan with right of redemption shall be 6 million. The player signed a contract worth 1.5 million visits tomorrow.
 

juve901

The Strategist
Jul 8, 2008
300
its his preferred position but to me he looked better on the flank. Also I would much rather Juve go back to a 4-3-3 where we could also try to put giovinco on the flank, why not try?
If you've watched Juve of the past, back when Seba was in Juve previously, he was played out-of-position... and that was on the flank.. and he was then moved on to Parma. Giovinco is only effective as a SS. Vucinic is effective as a SS or CF... he's more played as a SS because he's more creative, but he excels more as a CF. What's clear is that neither would be good on the flank. They both have played there previously, and they sucked.
 
Jul 20, 2012
20,044
If its only an loan + option to buy, is there ANY hope someone bigger (remy, doumbia, dzeko,etc) will come before deadline day?? I still cant believe this is happening
no

---------- Post added 30.08.2012 at 14:24 ----------

If you've watched Juve of the past, back when Seba was in Juve previously, he was played out-of-position... and that was on the flank.. and he was then moved on to Parma. Giovinco is only effective as a SS. Vucinic is effective as a SS or CF... he's more played as a SS because he's more creative, but he excels more as a CF. What's clear is that neither would be good on the flank. They both have played there previously, and they sucked.
I just dont see all the hype about Giovinco, yes it was only the first game but he didnt impress and vucinic didnt either. Why not give Matri a chance?
 

juve901

The Strategist
Jul 8, 2008
300
no

---------- Post added 30.08.2012 at 14:24 ----------



I just dont see all the hype about Giovinco, yes it was only the first game but he didnt impress and vucinic didnt either. Why not give Matri a chance?
Gotta give it more time. Too early to tell, but in italy many feel Gio-Vuc is the best combo for now. I wish Matri got more chances too. Since Seba is sidelined for now, we might see the Vuc-Matri attack this weekend (assuming... that.. Bend... Bendtner... doesn't.. ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh)
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,025
The real failure is the inability to sign a starting striker.

I don't really care that we're signing Bendtner. After failing to get a top striker, this is just a depth signing. If it wasn't him, it was obviously gonna be someone with similar qualities. What I care about is the inability to sign that starter for the attack. I understand that signing such top strikers is undoubtedly complicated and it doesn't depend solely on us, but still...
No excuses for failing to do it. I simply can't accept that we couldn't and everyone either rejected us or was too expensive.
This time I will go for blaming Marotta.

He has one more day, though, so I won't rush.
 

Trezegol17

Senior Member
Nov 1, 2006
9,131
The real failure is the inability to sign a starting striker.

I don't really care that we're signing Bendtner. After failing to get a top striker, this is just a depth signing. If it wasn't him, it was obviously gonna be someone with similar qualities. What I care about is the inability to sign that starter for the attack. I understand that signing such top strikers is undoubtedly complicated and it doesn't depend solely on us, but still...
No excuses for failing to do it. I simply can't accept that we couldn't and everyone either rejected us or was too expensive.
This time I will go for blaming Marotta.

He has one more day, though, so I won't rush.
Spot on Matz!

He will do nothing in the last day, if we sign Bendtner we showed our true ambition in europe for this season.
 

RAMI-N

★ ★ ★
Aug 22, 2006
21,473
The real failure is the inability to sign a starting striker.

I don't really care that we're signing Bendtner. After failing to get a top striker, this is just a depth signing. If it wasn't him, it was obviously gonna be someone with similar qualities. What I care about is the inability to sign that starter for the attack. I understand that signing such top strikers is undoubtedly complicated and it doesn't depend solely on us, but still...
No excuses for failing to do it. I simply can't accept that we couldn't and everyone either rejected us or was too expensive.
This time I will go for blaming Marotta.

He has one more day, though, so I won't rush.
:tup:
 

j0ker

Capo di tutti capi
Jan 5, 2006
22,892
The real failure is the inability to sign a starting striker.

I don't really care that we're signing Bendtner. After failing to get a top striker, this is just a depth signing. If it wasn't him, it was obviously gonna be someone with similar qualities. What I care about is the inability to sign that starter for the attack. I understand that signing such top strikers is undoubtedly complicated and it doesn't depend solely on us, but still...
No excuses for failing to do it. I simply can't accept that we couldn't and everyone either rejected us or was too expensive.
This time I will go for blaming Marotta.

He has one more day, though, so I won't rush.
:agree:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)